Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Technical decision · 1950s–1970s

Cyril Burt fabricated IQ twin data — the most famous fraud in psychology

Sir Cyril Burt published twin studies with fabricated data, invented co-authors, and correlation coefficients identical to three decimal places.

University College London · 1976-10-24

What happened

Sir Cyril Burt (1883–1971) was the most influential British psychologist of his generation, knighted in 1946 and appointed to the first chair of psychology at University College London. His most cited work was a series of twin studies on the heritability of intelligence, which reported remarkably high IQ correlations for identical twins reared apart — a key piece of evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence.

After Burt's death, the data began to unravel. In 1974, psychologist Leon Kamin noticed that Burt's correlation coefficients were identical to three decimal places across multiple papers when the sample size supposedly grew. In 1976, Sunday Times journalist Oliver Gillie could not trace two of Burt's co-authors — Margaret Howard and J. Conway — at any University of London institution. Burt's housekeeper recalled Burt saying they had 'done the research' but 'emigrated'. Burt's official biographer, Leslie Hearnshaw, concluded in 1979 that most of Burt's post-war data were fraudulent.

The scandal — known as 'the Burt Affair' — profoundly damaged behavioral genetics and the study of intelligence. Funding dried up, the field was stigmatized for a generation, and Burt's name became a byword for scientific fraud. His notes and records had been burned shortly after his death, making it impossible to fully reconstruct what was fabricated. The case remains the most famous example of research fraud in psychology.

Why it happened

  • Burt published correlation coefficients that were identical to three decimal places across different sample sizes — a statistical impossibility that should have been caught by peer review.
  • His co-authors Margaret Howard and J. Conway did not exist at any University of London institution between 1914 and 1976.
  • Burt edited the journal that published his own papers, bypassing independent peer review for years.
  • All of Burt's original notes and records were burned after his death, destroying any evidence that could have verified or refuted the claims.
What it costbehavioral genetics research discredited for decadescostly

The lesson

The researcher who edits the journal and reviews his own papers will never be caught in peer review. Independent replication is the only check that works.

Aftermath

The Burt Affair became a landmark case study in scientific misconduct. It led to stronger norms around data sharing, co-author transparency, and independent peer review in psychology. Behavioral genetics took decades to recover from the reputational damage. Burt's pre-war work is still considered broadly valid, but his post-war data are universally rejected.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →