On 17 May 2025 a YouTube pre-roll ad for Betway showed football fans wearing clothing and scarves carrying the Chelsea FC logo, part of a rewards campaign built around a stadium tour prize. Yadda Ltd complained that the ad was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
The ASA looked at who actually watched the platform. Ofcom's 2025 survey of 1,793 social media users aged 8-17 found 81% of that group used YouTube, and 20% of 8-17-year-olds with their own profile had registered a user age of at least 18. YouTube's sign-up self-verification, the ASA concluded, was not robust age verification, so under-18s were not excluded with the accuracy the CAP Code requires.
Betway defended the ad on four fronts: a B/CAP guidance exemption allowed sports team logos as identifiers of the gambling activity; the logo use was covered by its contract as Chelsea FC's Official European Betting Partner; the campaign targeted logged-in YouTube users aged 25+; and a brand-lift survey showed the ad's 8% awareness increase came entirely from users aged 55+. It warned the ban would set a 'damaging precedent for gambling sponsorships in sport'.
The ASA upheld the complaint on 22 October 2025. The logo appeared on fans' scarves, lanyards, hats, shirts and stadium backdrops — going well beyond the exemption for standalone identifying content. The ad breached CAP Code rules 16.1, 16.3 and 16.3.12 and must not appear again; future ads must not contain content of strong appeal to under-18s.
ad banned; sponsorship ads constrained
A crest is not a footnote: the Chelsea logo decorated scarves, lanyards, hats and backdrops, which the ASA ruled went beyond any logo exemption
A contractual right to use a club badge is a sponsorship deal, not an audience guarantee — the ASA judged the ad, not the contract
Betway's own brand-lift data showed the campaign's entire lift came from 55+ viewers: proof of who saw it, not of who could not
YouTube's self-declared birth dates were no age gate — 20% of 8-17-year-olds with a profile were registered as adults
Sponsorship rights are not audience facts. A club badge children wear has strong appeal to under-18s, and a platform's self-reported age checks cannot carry a gambling ad's compliance burden.
The ASA announced the Betway and Kwiff bans together on 22 October 2025, days after re-publishing the Sky Bet Gary Neville ruling — three operators, three bans, in the space of a week. Chelsea said it would work with partners to ensure compliance with industry standards; Google defended YouTube's policies. Betway called the ruling a 'damaging precedent', and sports-sponsorship commentary warned that club-branded betting ads now carried real regulatory risk.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE