Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2006

AWB paid A$290 million in kickbacks to Iraq — and lost its monopoly

Australia's state-chartered wheat exporter paid A$290 million in disguised kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime, destroying the company.

AWB Limited · 2006-11

What happened

AWB Limited was Australia's single-desk wheat exporter, a government-created monopoly that controlled the country's entire wheat trade. Under the UN Oil-for-Food Programme (1996–2003), which allowed Iraq to sell oil for humanitarian goods, AWB was the sole Australian supplier of wheat to Iraq. The company agreed to pay A$290 million in disguised kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime to retain its business.

The kickbacks were structured as inflated trucking fees paid to a Jordanian company called Alia, which kept a small percentage and funneled the rest to the Iraqi government. The arrangement began in 1999 and continued until the programme ended in 2003. AWB's own lawyers flagged the payments as illegal in 1999, but management chose to proceed.

The Cole Inquiry, a government-sanctioned investigation, found in November 2006 that AWB had knowingly paid kickbacks in violation of UN sanctions and Australian law. CEO Andrew Lindberg resigned, chairman Trevor Flugge was fined and banned from managing companies, and AWB was fined A$5 million by ASIC for misleading the UN. A shareholder class action settled for A$39.5 million. The scandal destroyed AWB's reputation, and the company was sold to Canadian agribusiness Agrium in 2010.

Why it happened

  • Management chose to pay kickbacks through a shell company even after lawyers warned the payments were illegal.
  • The single-desk monopoly created a culture of entitlement — AWB assumed it would never be held accountable.
  • AWB's internal governance failed to stop a scheme that senior executives personally approved.
  • The UN Oil-for-Food Programme had weak oversight, enabling AWB and other companies to exploit the system.
What it costA$290m kickbacks; A$5m fine; A$39.5m settlement; soldembarrassing

The lesson

A monopoly that knows it is the only option can convince itself it is above the law — and a company that ignores its own legal advice is already in trouble.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →