Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Software & IT · Strategic decision · 1946–1971

Konrad Zuse rebuilt his computer company alone — over-indebted, he lost it, and his name

After 1945 Zuse rebuilt his computer firm with no state or bank behind it. In 1964 over-indebtedness took his shares; in 1971 the name Zuse KG was deleted.

Zuse KG

HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.

What it means today

Deep-tech founders bootstrapping without institutional backing: price the growth before it arrives. Hand-to-mouth success turns into over-indebtedness faster than failure does — and the rescue usually costs the founder's shares and the name.

What happened

Konrad Zuse had built the first programmable computers before the war; after it he started again from nothing. In 1946 he opened an engineering office in Hopferau in the Allgäu, and in 1949, with Harro Stucken and Alfred Eckhard, re-founded the Zuse KG in Neukirchen. His bet: independent German computer-making, with no state and no bank behind it. The first money came from repairing his pre-war Z4 and renting it to ETH Zurich, where it ran from 1950 to 1955, and from building some thirty arithmetic units for Remington Rand's M9.

Serial production followed: the Z11 from 1956, the Z22 in 1958 — fifty-five delivered — and the Z23, the company's first transistor machine. The works moved to Bad Hersfeld in 1957; by 1969 the Zuse KG had built 251 computers. Then the growth broke the balance sheet: in 1964, over-indebted, Konrad Zuse had to surrender his capital shares, and Brown, Boveri & Cie took the company over in 1964–65. Siemens bought seventy per cent in 1967 and the rest in 1969; Zuse left in 1967.

In early April 1971 the company name Zuse KG was deleted. The story is told in Zuse's own voice in his memoir, Der Computer — Mein Lebenswerk (The Computer — My Life's Work): the rebuilding from nothing, the rented Z4, the machines built to order, and the year the growth he had financed alone over-indebted him and took the company with it.

Why it happened

  • No state, no bank, no deep-pocketed patron: every expansion year was financed from rentals and parts orders, so the growth itself piled up as debt.
  • Independence was the product and the trap — the pitch of a free German computer company was also why nobody caught it when the balance sheet turned.
  • The 1964 crisis came out of success, not failure: storm-like growth over-indebted the founder, and the rescue cost him his shares and, within years, the name.
What it costhis shares, his company, and his name on itcostly

The lesson

Zuse rebuilt from nothing after losing everything, but a company financed only by its own growth has no shock absorber. Independence is a cost structure — the bill arrives when business is best.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →