Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2009–2023

Zulily went from $2.6B IPO to going-out-of-business sale in 10 years

The flash-sale site for moms ran 72-hour sales, held no inventory, and grew fast — until the model stopped working and the company stopped paying vendors.

Zulily · 2023-12

What happened

Zulily was founded in 2009 by former Blue Nile executives Darrell Cavens and Mark Vadon, targeting young mothers with a flash-sale ecommerce model: brand-name children's apparel, apparel, and home goods sold in 72-hour events, with the company holding no inventory. It grew rapidly — by 2012 it had 10 million members, and its 2013 IPO valued the company at $2.6 billion. Revenue reached $366 million by 2016.

The model had a hidden flaw. Zulily sold products before ordering them from vendors, which meant customers waited weeks for delivery and had no recourse when items were defective or wrong. Customer retention suffered. Revenue growth slowed from 52% to 29% in 2015, and QVC's parent Qurate Retail Group acquired Zulily for $2.4 billion in 2015. Under Qurate, revenue declined steadily — by 2023 it was down 17% year-over-year to $192 million in Q1, with a $43 million operating loss.

In May 2023, private equity firm Regent bought Zulily from Qurate. The new owners did not pay vendors, and lawsuits over unpaid invoices mounted. The CEO left in October 2023. In December, Zulily announced a going-out-of-business sale, laid off 800+ employees, and appointed an assignee to liquidate assets. The brand was sold for $4.5 million in 2024 — a 99.8% drop from its peak valuation.

Why it happened

  • Zulily's flash-sale model made customers wait weeks for delivery, ordering from vendors only after each sale — the model traded speed for cash, and customers left for faster alternatives.
  • Qurate never integrated Zulily effectively, letting revenue decline for eight years without fixing the underlying business model or the customer experience.
  • Regent bought Zulily without the capital to operate it, then stopped paying vendors — the acquisition was a transfer of ownership, not a turnaround plan.
What it cost$2.6B peak to $4.5M fire sale, 800+ jobs lostcatastrophic

The lesson

A business model that makes customers wait weeks for delivery while competitors ship overnight is not a business model — it is a bet that customers have no alternatives.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →