Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2024

Zhiji's launch deck mislabeled a rival's specs — Xiaomi demanded a formal apology

Pitching its L6 against the SU7, Zhiji printed wrong motor specs for Xiaomi's car. Xiaomi issued three statements overnight; Zhiji apologised twice by dawn.

Zhiji Auto (智己汽车) · Xiaomi Auto (小米汽车) · 2024-04-08

What happened

On 8 April 2024 Zhiji Auto, the EV venture backed by SAIC, launched its L6 sedan with a spec-by-spec comparison against Xiaomi's new SU7. The deck mislabeled the SU7 Max's drive system as front IGBT, rear silicon carbide — understating the rival car, which like the L6 uses silicon carbide modules front and rear.

Xiaomi's spokesperson account fired three statements between 23:24 and past midnight: the misstatement had caused serious harm, Zhiji must apologise formally and publicly — a light, informal individual apology would not be accepted — or Xiaomi would take legal action. Zhiji co-CEO Liu Tao had already posted an individual apology at 23:04; after Xiaomi's third statement the brand's official account issued a formal apology letter at 0:47.

The episode swallowed the launch itself: coverage centred on the misstatement and the midnight exchange of statements rather than the car, and critics accused Zhiji of chasing traffic by attacking a rival's spec sheet. The co-CEO's side remarks at the event — staff missing their children's births, working through illness — drew a second wave of criticism.

Why it happened

  • Comparative advertising makes every spec a claim: one wrong cell on the comparison deck became the story of the launch
  • An individual apology read as minimising — Xiaomi explicitly rejected it, forcing a formal corporate apology within hours
  • Attacking the benchmark hands the benchmark the stage: Xiaomi's three statements redirected the night's traffic to itself
What it costThree Xiaomi statements; two apologies; launch overshadowedembarrassing

The lesson

If your pitch rests on a rival's spec sheet, every figure is a claim you own: Zhiji's one wrong cell bought three hostile statements and two apologies on launch night.

Aftermath

Zhiji reported L6 pre-orders passing 10,000 afterwards — some commentators joked even bad press is press — but the launch is remembered for the apology exchange, and the deck went into industry case files as the price of sloppy benchmarking.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →