Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2014–2020

Zhangzidao's scallops died, starved, and ran away — three times, all fake

A seafood company wrote off ¥2B in ocean-floor inventory to natural disasters. The CSRC found the disasters were invented. Lifetime ban.

Zhangzidao Group · 2019-07

What happened

Zhangzidao Group farms scallops, sea cucumbers and abalone on the ocean floor off Dalian. Its inventory lives underwater, on 1 million mu of seabed, where independent verification is effectively impossible. On 30 October 2014, the company announced that cold-water currents had killed its scallop crop across 1,056,400 mu, wiping out ¥812 million in value. The first three quarters swung from profit to an ¥812 million loss.

In January 2018, Zhangzidao issued a performance forecast correction that triggered market suspicion. On 12 February 2018, the CSRC opened a formal investigation. In January 2019, the company announced a second disaster: its scallops had starved. A third write-off followed. The repeated 'natural disasters' destroying the same category of inventory became a national joke — 'the scallops ran away' (扇贝跑了) entered Chinese internet slang as a synonym for stock-market fraud.

On 10 July 2019, the CSRC published its findings. The 2016 and 2017 annual reports contained false records: the scallop inventory figures, the asset write-offs, and the sampling results had been fabricated. The company was fined ¥600,000. Chairman Wu Hougang received a lifetime ban from the securities market. Twenty-four other individuals were penalised with fines and market bans ranging from three to ten years.

On 11 September 2020, the CSRC referred the case to public security authorities for criminal prosecution on charges of illegal disclosure and non-disclosure of material information. The case established that biological assets on the ocean floor are not beyond regulatory reach — and that 'the scallops died' is not an audit defence.

Why it happened

  • Ocean-floor inventory is unverifiable by standard audit: you cannot count scallops under 30 metres of water, so the company's own reports were the only evidence — and they were fabricated
  • The 'natural disaster' explanation exploited agriculture accounting: biological assets are marked to estimated value, and a weather event lets you write them to zero without a physical count
  • The first write-off (2014) was accepted by auditors and the market, which established the template; the second and third repeated the same mechanism because the first had not been challenged
  • The CSRC needed satellite data and ocean-current modelling to disprove the claims — the capacity to verify did not exist until the fraud was three iterations old
What it cost¥2B+ in false write-offs; lifetime ban; criminal referralcatastrophic

The lesson

An asset that cannot be independently counted can be lied about. The scallops were real enough to book, invisible enough to erase. 'Hard to verify' and 'does not exist' are the same claim.

Aftermath

Zhangzidao's shares were given special treatment (ST) status. The case is cited in Chinese securities regulation alongside Kangmei Pharmaceutical as an example of inventory-based fraud. '扇贝跑了' remains the standard Chinese metaphor for a company that makes its assets disappear.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →