The encyclopedia · People & Management · People decision · 2015
Zappos scrapped its managers for 'holacracy' — and a chunk of staff walked out
In 2013 Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh replaced managers with 'holacracy' self-managing teams. In 2015 he offered buyouts to anyone who didn't want it; about 14% left.
Zappos · 2015-03
What happened
Zappos, the online shoe retailer owned by Amazon, was famous for its distinctive, employee-friendly culture under CEO Tony Hsieh. In 2013, Hsieh made a radical bet: he began replacing Zappos's traditional management hierarchy with 'holacracy,' a system of self-managing teams with no bosses, intended to make the company more agile and entrepreneurial.
The experiment was divisive. Holacracy replaced managers with overlapping 'circles' and detailed governance rules; some employees found it liberating, but many found it confusing and bureaucratic — critics called it 'administrivia' that funneled decisions through layers of circles. In 2015, Hsieh sent an email offering a severance package to any employee who did not want to stay under the new system.
About 14% of Zappos's staff took the offer and left — a deliberate attempt, the company said, to keep only people who believed in holacracy. The episode made Zappos a case study in radical organizational change: a bold experiment in self-management that energized some and alienated others, and that raised hard questions about whether you can impose a culture by asking people to accept it or walk away. (Medium tried holacracy too, and abandoned it in 2016.)
Why it happened
- Hsieh imposed a radical, unfamiliar structure (holacracy) across the whole company, replacing the management hierarchy many employees depended on.
- Holacracy's detailed rules and circle governance struck many as confusing and bureaucratic, the opposite of the agility it promised.
- The 2015 'accept it or leave' buyout offer turned a culture experiment into a loyalty test, driving out employees who didn't embrace the new system.
- A structure designed to empower teams was rolled out top-down, without giving people time or choice to adapt.
The lesson
A radical reorganization imposed from the top can drive out the people you most want to keep. Zappos's holacracy was meant to boost agility, but 'accept it or leave' turned the experiment into a purge
Aftermath
Zappos's holacracy experiment is taught as a case study in the limits of radical organizational change. It showed that a well-intentioned reorganization, imposed from the top and made a condition of employment, can drive out talented people who simply didn't want to work that way — and that 'self-management' mandated from above is a contradiction.
Sources
- Holacracy — Wikipedia (Zappos adoption, 2015 ~14% voluntary departures)
- Beyond the holacracy experiment — Forbes (Sep 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Amazon's warehouse productivity targets were so aggressive that workers peed in bottles
Susan Fowler's blog post exposed Uber's toxic culture — and forced the CEO out
Glossier built a $1.8B DTC brand — then stores and a failed line extension drained it
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.