Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 1999–2003

YKK led a €328M zipper cartel — the world's biggest fastener maker rigged prices for years

YKK and five other fastener companies met secretly to fix prices and share customers. The Commission fined YKK €150M for its ringleader role.

YKK Corporation · 2007-09

What happened

YKK Corporation, the world's largest zipper manufacturer, led a price-fixing cartel in the European fasteners market from May 1999 to November 2003. The cartel covered zippers, buttons, press fasteners, and other attachment systems used in clothing, footwear, luggage, and textile goods. Participants coordinated prices, allocated customers, and exchanged commercially sensitive information through a series of secret meetings and bilateral contacts across the European Economic Area.

The European Commission uncovered the cartel after Prym Group, the third-largest player, applied for immunity under the 2002 Leniency Notice and provided decisive evidence. Coats, the second-largest player, cooperated and received a 30% reduction. YKK, as the ringleader, received a 50% fine increase. On 19 September 2007, the Commission imposed fines totaling €328 million: YKK Group €150 million, Coats €122 million, Scovill €10.5 million, Berning & Söhne €3.5 million, and Koh-i-noor €1.5 million. Prym received full immunity.

YKK appealed the decision to the General Court of the European Union, arguing the fine was disproportionate and challenging its designation as the ringleader. The General Court largely upheld the Commission's decision in 2011 but slightly reduced the fine due to a minor procedural error. In October 2014, the European Court of Justice further reduced part of the fine from €19.25 million to €2.79 million. The core finding of the cartel was never overturned.

Why it happened

  • YKK dominated the global fastener market and used its position to orchestrate collusion instead of competing. The cartel was a deliberate choice by senior management.
  • The cartel lasted 4.5 years because the participants trusted their secrecy. What broke it was a leniency applicant, not a regulator's investigation.
  • YKK's appeal failed because the facts were well documented. The Commission had meeting notes, price lists, and testimony from cooperating companies.
What it cost€150M fine (€328M total for the cartel)costly

The lesson

A dominant market position that is used to rig prices rather than compete attracts the maximum penalty — and the ringleader pays the most. Leniency programmes turn cartel members against each other.

Aftermath

The case is a standard reference in European competition law teaching. YKK's fine was the largest ever imposed on a single company in a cartel case at the time, and the 50% ringleader uplift became a benchmark for subsequent Commission decisions.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →