Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2020-2026

Vetements spent six years fighting to trademark its own name — and lost

The brand's name is just French for "clothing"; the Supreme Court declined its final appeal in 2026, leaving it with no US trademark on the word

Vetements Group AG · 2026-01-12

What happened

Vetements filed two US trademark applications in June 2020 for VETEMENTS, covering apparel and online retail store services. The USPTO rejected both in December 2021 under the doctrine of foreign equivalents: 'vetements' is simply the French word for 'clothing', so registering it would let one company own a generic term for the very goods it sells.

Vetements argued the word was obscure enough to Americans — fewer than 1% of the US speaks French — and pointed to its 4.1 million Instagram followers as evidence the name had become distinctive. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rejected that in April 2023, and the Federal Circuit affirmed in May 2025, writing that 'words from modern languages are generally translated into English.'

Vetements took the case to the Supreme Court. The US Solicitor General filed a brief in November 2025 urging the justices to deny review, arguing a trademark on 'clothing' would defeat the basic purpose of trademark law. On January 12, 2026, the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal, ending the case for good.

Why it happened

  • The brand's name, translated, simply describes the product category — clever in French, generic under US law, which asks what an ordinary buyer understands the word to mean.
  • Vetements pursued full federal registration for six years through the USPTO, the TTAB, the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court instead of settling for a narrower, faster protection.
What it cost6-year suit lost; no US federal trademark on its own nameembarrassing

The lesson

A brand name that translates to the name of the product it sells will not clear trademark review just because most customers do not speak the language it came from.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →