The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2020-2026
Vetements spent six years fighting to trademark its own name — and lost
The brand's name is just French for "clothing"; the Supreme Court declined its final appeal in 2026, leaving it with no US trademark on the word
Vetements Group AG · 2026-01-12
What happened
Vetements filed two US trademark applications in June 2020 for VETEMENTS, covering apparel and online retail store services. The USPTO rejected both in December 2021 under the doctrine of foreign equivalents: 'vetements' is simply the French word for 'clothing', so registering it would let one company own a generic term for the very goods it sells.
Vetements argued the word was obscure enough to Americans — fewer than 1% of the US speaks French — and pointed to its 4.1 million Instagram followers as evidence the name had become distinctive. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rejected that in April 2023, and the Federal Circuit affirmed in May 2025, writing that 'words from modern languages are generally translated into English.'
Vetements took the case to the Supreme Court. The US Solicitor General filed a brief in November 2025 urging the justices to deny review, arguing a trademark on 'clothing' would defeat the basic purpose of trademark law. On January 12, 2026, the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal, ending the case for good.
Why it happened
- The brand's name, translated, simply describes the product category — clever in French, generic under US law, which asks what an ordinary buyer understands the word to mean.
- Vetements pursued full federal registration for six years through the USPTO, the TTAB, the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court instead of settling for a narrower, faster protection.
The lesson
A brand name that translates to the name of the product it sells will not clear trademark review just because most customers do not speak the language it came from.
Sources
- The Fashion Law | Supreme Court Declines to Hear Trademark Case Over Vetements Name
- The Fashion Law | Can You Trademark the Word 'Clothing' (Not in French)? Vetements
- The Fashion Law | Vetements Takes Its Name Fight to the Supreme Court
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Sanrio blocked Hello Kitty licensees from selling across EU borders — €6.2M fine
Guess restricted its own retailers from selling online — the EC fined them €40M
YKK led a €328M zipper cartel — the world's biggest fastener maker rigged prices for years
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.