Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Legal decision · 2022–2026

WatchFund, Singapore's luxury watch investment scheme, collapsed — founder bankrupt

Celebrity photographer Dominic Khoo built a $38M watch investment business. Courts found breach of contract, and he filed for bankruptcy.

WatchFund · 2026-04

What happened

Dominic Khoo was a Singaporean celebrity photographer who transitioned into luxury watch dealing. He founded WatchFund, a business that pooled investor money to buy luxury watches — Audemars Piguet, Girard-Perregaux, and others — then sold them for profit and shared returns. Khoo lived in a colonial bungalow, cycled through luxury cars, and socialized with celebrities like Dennis Rodman. He claimed his operation was worth $38 million.

But the business was built on shaky ground. In 2024, Singapore's High Court found WatchFund in breach of contract over watches worth $2.5 million, with five investors suing Khoo and a Hong Kong firm. The New York Times published an investigation in April 2026 titled 'He Got Rich Buying and Selling Luxury Watches. Was It a Ponzi Scheme?' alleging that Khoo was running a scheme where new investor money paid earlier investors.

Khoo filed for bankruptcy and is under investigation for fraud. The case exposed the risks of unregulated watch investment schemes, where a charismatic founder can raise millions on trust alone, with no audited financials or independent oversight. The 'ghost watches' controversy — where investors claimed watches were overpriced in court, then sold them at auction for higher prices — added a surreal twist.

Why it happened

  • WatchFund operated on trust rather than audited financials, with no independent oversight of how investor money was used or how watches were valued.
  • The High Court found WatchFund in breach of contract, and the New York Times investigation raised allegations of a Ponzi-like structure where new funds paid earlier investors.
  • Khoo's celebrity lifestyle and personal brand attracted investors who did not conduct due diligence, creating a pool of money that could be mismanaged without detection.
What it cost$38M operation collapsed; founder bankrupt, under probecostly

The lesson

Luxury asset investment schemes are only as solid as their oversight. Without audited financials and independent custody, investors bet on the founder's honesty — and honesty is not a control.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →