Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2019–2025

Vans chased off-price retail growth for years — then admitted it devalued its own brand

VF Corp's brand chief: 'We expanded into value channels and devalued the brand itself. It was a mistake.' Vans revenue fell from $2.79B to $2.35B in a year.

VF Corp · Vans

What happened

Vans was VF Corp's best-performing brand for years, built on skate-shop credibility and limited distribution. To keep growing after the pandemic, VF pushed Vans into discount department stores and off-price 'value' retail doors, alongside heavy promotional pricing at its own stores. Sales rose in the short term, but the brand's scarcity and cachet went with them.

By fiscal 2024, Vans revenue had fallen 24% to $2.79 billion. The slide continued into fiscal 2025: fourth-quarter revenue dropped 22% to $493 million, and full-year Vans revenue fell a further 16% to roughly $2.35 billion, dragging VF Corp's total quarterly revenue down 5% even as every other major brand — The North Face (+2%), Timberland (+10%) — grew.

In May 2025, VF Corp global brand president Sun Choe named the cause without softening it: 'We expanded into value channels and devalued the brand itself. It was a mistake, and we're fixing it.' The company's response was to reverse course — exiting roughly 1,800 low-value wholesale doors while adding 800 higher-value ones, closing stores, and cutting China inventory, which accounted for 60% of the quarter's decline by VF's own accounting.

The correction came with layoffs: VF Corp cut 400 jobs company-wide in 2025, including 82 at its Costa Mesa headquarters, as part of CEO Bracken Darrell's 'Reinvent' turnaround plan targeting $300 million in savings.

Why it happened

  • Chasing revenue through wider, cheaper distribution is easy to measure quarter to quarter; the cost — brand scarcity, pricing power, resale value — only shows up after the damage is structural.
  • A brand's value depends on where it is sold as much as what it sells; putting the same product in off-price and premium channels at once erodes both simultaneously.
  • Reversing overdistribution takes years, not quarters, because wholesale contracts and inventory pipelines can't be unwound as fast as they were built.
What it costVans revenue fell $2.79B to $2.35B in FY2025costly

The lesson

Distribution is part of the product. Selling a premium brand through discount channels to hit a growth number trades long-term pricing power for a short-term revenue bump.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →