The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
Unitcom ran thirteen 'time-limited' PC sales in a row — the deadline never mattered
Every iiyamaPC cashback campaign ended with 'Until Monday 16:59!' — and the next one started immediately with the same or better deal. CAA measure order.
Unitcom · 2025-03-27
What happened
Unitcom, the Osaka-based PC retailer behind the PC Koubou stores and iiyamaPC brand, ran a chain of cashback campaigns on its website from 5 September 2022 to 10 July 2023. Each one was framed as a deadline: 'Time-limited! Until Oct 3 (Mon) 10:59!', 'Year-End/New Year Grand Cashback Festival — Until Dec 12 (Mon) 16:59!!', 'New Life Support Cashback Festival — up to ¥100,000 back!!'. Thirteen campaigns in ten months, each ending with an urgent date and time.
None of the deadlines meant anything. When one campaign expired, the next began at once with the same or better terms; buyers who purchased after a 'final' deadline received points or gift vouchers of equal or greater value on the same conditions. The Consumer Affairs Agency ruled the displays misleading about advantageous terms: the urgency told consumers that buying inside the window was uniquely beneficial, when waiting cost nothing.
On 27 March 2025 the CAA issued a measure order. Unitcom apologised publicly the same day, accepting the order 'seriously and sincerely', and promised stronger internal review and compliance systems. The pattern — thirteen identical deadlines — was exactly what the order recited.
Why it happened
- Thirteen consecutive 'time-limited' campaigns ran back-to-back: each deadline was immediately followed by an equal or better offer.
- Post-deadline buyers got the same or greater cashback — the urgency was manufactured.
- Advantageous-terms misrepresentation reaches pricing psychology: the deadline itself was the misleading claim.
The lesson
A time limit is a promise that the deal ends: Unitcom ran thirteen back-to-back 'limited' cashback sales for iiyamaPC, and Japan ruled the urgency itself misleading.
Aftermath
The measure order of 27 March 2025 required Unitcom to publicly notify consumers that the time-limited displays were misleading, prevent recurrence and report to the CAA. Unitcom, a subsidiary of MCJ, published an apology the same day.
Sources
- 消費者庁: 株式会社ユニットコムに対する景品表示法に基づく措置命令について (27 March 2025)
- PC Watch: 消費者庁、景品表示法違反でユニットコムへ措置命令 (28 March 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
SNOW paid people to post on X how cute its AI filter was — without saying it was an ad
SoftBank's SB C&S sold a screen coating that 'prevented scratches and viruses' — no proof
Fujitsu's web shop showed 'WEB prices' nobody had paid and deadlines that never bit
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.