The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
SoftBank's SB C&S sold a screen coating that 'prevented scratches and viruses' — no proof
INVOL ULTRA Coating promised scratch prevention and antiviral effects on phone screens, with an SIAA mark. The evidence SB C&S filed was rejected.
SB C&S · 2025-12-18
What happened
SB C&S, the SoftBank group company that distributes phones and accessories, sold liquid screen coatings under the INVOL brand: ULTRA Coating and Extra Fine Coating for smartphones and tablets. The packaging, the product websites, the 'Toretech!' store site and a YouTube video promised that 'a strong glass film protects the product from scratches', 'scratch prevention' and — for the ULTRA line — 'antiviral and antibacterial' effects, carrying the SIAA mark and claims that bacteria would be 'suppressed to 1/100 or less'. The displays ran from July 2023 to August 2025.
The Consumer Affairs Agency demanded substantiation. SB C&S submitted materials within the deadline — but the CAA rejected them: the testing methods did not support the scratch-prevention, antibacterial or antiviral claims as displayed. The displays were ruled misleading representations of superiority, and the measure order came on 18 December 2025. The coatings had been sold through SoftBank shops and other retailers; sales had already ended.
The order required SB C&S to publicly notify consumers that the displays were misleading, to adopt recurrence-prevention measures with CAA-approved wording, and to report back. The company said it took the order seriously and would strengthen compliance — a SoftBank-group product pulled down by its own packaging claims.
Why it happened
- The coating promised scratch prevention and antiviral effects with an SIAA mark — and the testing behind the submitted evidence was found wanting.
- The claims ran across packaging, two websites and YouTube for over two years; all of it counted.
- Submitting substantiation is no shield if the tests don't support the claim as displayed.
The lesson
An SIAA mark on the box doesn't settle the law's question: SB C&S's screen-coating claims failed substantiation review, and Japan ordered the SoftBank unit to publicly correct them.
Aftermath
The measure order of 18 December 2025 required SB C&S to publicly notify consumers and prevent recurrence. The company said it took the order seriously; sales of the INVOL coatings had already ended.
Sources
- 消費者庁: SB C&S株式会社に対する景品表示法に基づく措置命令について (18 December 2025)
- 時事ドットコム: ソフトバンク子会社に措置命令 スマホ画面保護剤で不当表示―消費者庁 (18 December 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
SNOW paid people to post on X how cute its AI filter was — without saying it was an ad
Unitcom ran thirteen 'time-limited' PC sales in a row — the deadline never mattered
Fujitsu's web shop showed 'WEB prices' nobody had paid and deadlines that never bit
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.