Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2025

One supplier sat in 30% of a UBS fund — First Brands' fall shut the funds down

O'Connor's working capital fund held about 30% First Brands-linked invoices. After the bankruptcy UBS wound the funds down — including one with no exposure.

UBS · 2025-11-07

What happened

UBS O'Connor, the private credit and commodities unit, ran 'Working Capital Opportunistic' funds that financed companies by buying their invoices. First Brands was a flagship relationship: a January 2023 case study pitched a 17% yield on 60-day investments linked to the auto parts supplier. When First Brands filed Chapter 11 in late September 2025, one O'Connor fund held roughly 30% of its portfolio in First Brands-linked exposure — 9.1% direct, via the supplier's own invoices, and 21.4% indirect, via invoices of its customers. Client exposure across UBS exceeded $500 million.

In October 2025 UBS told investors it would wind down the affected funds; by early November the shutdown had spread to a roughly $600 million 'High Grade' invoice fund with no First Brands exposure at all. UBS said no investment guidelines had been breached and CFO Todd Tuckner said the bank itself carried no balance-sheet risk, with about 70% of the affected fund expected to be monetized by end-2025. The collapse also clouded the sale of O'Connor to Cantor Fitzgerald, with reports that the buyer sought to renegotiate the terms.

Why it happened

  • A book of many invoices was really a book of one supplier's chain — 30% of the fund sat in exposures that all led back to First Brands.
  • The 17% yield advertised in the case study priced a risk nobody named: that the invoices might not exist once.
  • The unit held a minority stake in Raistone, the platform arranging the finance it bought — the origination chain ran through an affiliate.
What it costover $500M stuck; funds liquidated; sale repricedcostly

The lesson

A portfolio of invoices is only as diversified as the payers behind them. When one supplier's chain is 30% of the book, you hold one credit — and when it breaks, even the clean fund next door shuts.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →