Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2013–2019

Tongaat Hulett backdated land sales to flatter its profits — then the shares fell 76%

A PwC probe found Tongaat executives overstated profits for years by backdating land sales and capitalising expenses. Shares fell 76%; the JSE fined it.

Tongaat Hulett · 2019-11

What happened

Tongaat Hulett was a long-established Southern African group with two very different businesses: sugar, across South Africa, Zimbabwe and Mozambique, and property, developing land in South Africa. In 2019 it appointed PwC to investigate its accounts, and the findings, released in November, described a company in which senior executives had 'initiated or participated in undesirable accounting practices' for years.

The techniques were varied and concrete. In the property business, land-sale agreements had been backdated and revenue recognised before zoning and subdivision approvals were in place, pulling sales into earlier periods. In the sugar business, the carrying value of cane and cane roots was overstated, and ordinary maintenance and overhead costs were capitalised as assets instead of being expensed. In Zimbabwe, arrangements that were in substance financing were structured and priced as sugar sales. The effect was to overstate both revenue and profits, and to inflate assets on the balance sheet.

PwC implicated at least ten senior executives, including the former chief executive Peter Staude and the former chief financial officer, and described a 'culture of deference and lack of challenge' in which staff followed accounting instructions without questioning them. The market's verdict was swift: Tongaat Hulett's shares had already fallen 76% in 2019 before trading was suspended in Johannesburg in June. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange later fined the company R7.5 million for non-compliance.

Tongaat Hulett is a textbook case of how a business can manufacture profit on paper. The revenue was recognised too early, the costs were hidden in assets, and a culture that did not challenge the numbers let it continue across two industries and three countries — until a new management team looked, and the market repriced the company in weeks.

Why it happened

  • Senior executives overstated profits and assets for years — recognising land-sale revenue too early (some agreements backdated) and capitalising expenses that should have been written off.
  • The practices spanned both the property and sugar businesses and operations in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Mozambique.
  • PwC found a 'culture of deference and lack of challenge' and implicated at least ten senior executives, including the former chief executive and chief financial officer.
  • The shares fell 76% in 2019 before trading was suspended in June, the JSE fined the company R7.5 million, and new management had to restate the accounts and rebuild the business.
What it costProfits overstated; shares fell 76%; JSE finecatastrophic

The lesson

Profit recognised too early must be given back. Tongaat pulled revenue forward and buried costs in assets; when the restatement came, the market removed years of imagined value at once.

Aftermath

Tongaat Hulett restated its accounts, brought in a new chief executive, and said it would pursue criminal and civil action against those involved, including recovering bonuses and seeking orders declaring them delinquent directors. The case is cited in South African corporate governance as an example of how a board that does not challenge its finance function can preside over years of manufactured profit — and how quickly a market corrects once the real numbers appear.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →