Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2019

Ticketmaster showed a price — the checkout added the real one, and Canada fined $4.5M

June 2019: Ticketmaster paid $4.5M to settle Canada's drip-pricing case — advertised ticket prices ballooned with mandatory fees revealed only at checkout.

Ticketmaster L.L.C. · 2019-06

What happened

Ticketmaster advertised ticket prices on its Canadian site — and then, stage by stage through the purchase, added mandatory fees: service charges, processing charges, facility charges. The number the fan saw first was not the number the fan paid. Canada's Competition Bureau called the practice by its name: drip pricing, a misleading pricing claim under the Competition Act.

On 27 June 2019, Ticketmaster L.L.C., TNow Entertainment Group and Ticketmaster Canada LP entered a consent agreement: a $4 million penalty plus $500,000 toward the Bureau's investigation costs — $4.5 million in all — and a commitment to bring advertised prices in line with what buyers actually pay, backed by a compliance program.

The case followed Bell Canada's $10 million penalty of 2011 and extended the Bureau's rule from telecom bundles to the digital economy: a price that can only be reached by adding mandatory fees is not a price, it is an opening bid. StubHub would face the same finding eight months later.

Why it happened

  • The advertised price was an opening bid: mandatory fees surfaced stage by stage, each one changing the deal.
  • Drip pricing exploits the sunk cost of the checkout — by the time the fees appear, the buyer is mid-purchase.
  • Canada had already priced this deception at the statutory maximum with Bell; Ticketmaster paid for learning it late.
What it cost$4.5M penalty and costs; pricing correctedcostly

The lesson

The advertised price must be the payable price: fees that only appear at checkout make every upstream ad misleading, and regulators now treat drip pricing as false advertising, not a fee schedule.

Aftermath

The consent agreement was registered with the Competition Tribunal with the force of a court order, and the Bureau kept going: StubHub settled for $1.3 million in February 2020, and Parliament wrote drip pricing into the Competition Act in 2022.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →