Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2014–2017

TeliaSonera paid US$965M for buying its way into Uzbekistan

The Nordic telecom giant paid at least US$330M in fake consulting fees to enter Uzbekistan; the global settlement cost US$965M.

Telia Company · 2017-09-21

What happened

Sweden-based Telia (then TeliaSonera) entered Uzbekistan's mobile market with the help of what the SEC later described as at least US$330 million in bribes — payments to a shell company under the guise of lobbying and consulting services that never actually occurred. The shell was controlled by an Uzbek government official who was a family member of the President and in a position to influence officials to benefit Telia's business.

The bill arrived in stages. US and Dutch authorities opened a probe into suspected bribery over Telia's Uzbekistan licence in spring 2014. In February 2016, peer VimpelCom settled a similar case for US$795 million. In September 2016 the US and Dutch authorities proposed a settlement worth about US$1.4 billion — chairman Marie Ehrling conceded Telia had entered the market 'in an unethical and wrongful way' but called the proposed amount very high.

A year later the negotiating was over. In September 2017 Telia agreed to pay US$965 million to resolve charges with the SEC, the US Department of Justice, the Dutch Openbaar Ministerie and the Swedish Åklagarmyndigheten: US$457 million in SEC disgorgement plus a criminal fine of more than US$508 million from the DOJ, with portions offsettable against the Dutch and Swedish payments. Telia's total to the four agencies had to be at least US$965 million.

The settlement, nearly three times the size of the bribes the SEC said were paid, closed a case whose arithmetic was simple: a market entry priced as consulting fees, exposed by four agencies working together. The fiction that the payments were legitimate services had held long enough for the money to move — and the final bill still arrived.

Why it happened

  • The bribes were booked as services: the shell's lobbying and consulting never happened, yet the fiction held inside the company long enough for the payments to be made and the licence to be won.
  • Telia treated market entry as a negotiation with whoever controlled access — an official paid directly through a shell, 'in a position to exert significant influence' over others.
  • When the bill arrived, Telia still tried to bargain: after admitting the entry was 'unethical and wrongful', it called the US$1.4 billion proposal very high — then settled for US$965 million anyway.
  • Four agencies shared the recovery — SEC, DOJ, the Dutch Openbaar Ministerie and the Swedish Åklagarmyndigheten — so there was no single negotiator to stall and no clean exit.
What it costUS$965M settlement: US$457M disgorgement + US$508M finecatastrophic

The lesson

A bribe booked as a consulting fee is still a bribe — and the fee is only the first instalment. When regulators coordinate, the real bill arrives: nearly three times what was paid.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →