The encyclopedia · Legal & Compliance · Legal decision · 2014–2017
TeliaSonera paid US$965M for buying its way into Uzbekistan
The Nordic telecom giant paid at least US$330M in fake consulting fees to enter Uzbekistan; the global settlement cost US$965M.
Telia Company · 2017-09-21
What happened
Sweden-based Telia (then TeliaSonera) entered Uzbekistan's mobile market with the help of what the SEC later described as at least US$330 million in bribes — payments to a shell company under the guise of lobbying and consulting services that never actually occurred. The shell was controlled by an Uzbek government official who was a family member of the President and in a position to influence officials to benefit Telia's business.
The bill arrived in stages. US and Dutch authorities opened a probe into suspected bribery over Telia's Uzbekistan licence in spring 2014. In February 2016, peer VimpelCom settled a similar case for US$795 million. In September 2016 the US and Dutch authorities proposed a settlement worth about US$1.4 billion — chairman Marie Ehrling conceded Telia had entered the market 'in an unethical and wrongful way' but called the proposed amount very high.
A year later the negotiating was over. In September 2017 Telia agreed to pay US$965 million to resolve charges with the SEC, the US Department of Justice, the Dutch Openbaar Ministerie and the Swedish Åklagarmyndigheten: US$457 million in SEC disgorgement plus a criminal fine of more than US$508 million from the DOJ, with portions offsettable against the Dutch and Swedish payments. Telia's total to the four agencies had to be at least US$965 million.
The settlement, nearly three times the size of the bribes the SEC said were paid, closed a case whose arithmetic was simple: a market entry priced as consulting fees, exposed by four agencies working together. The fiction that the payments were legitimate services had held long enough for the money to move — and the final bill still arrived.
Why it happened
- The bribes were booked as services: the shell's lobbying and consulting never happened, yet the fiction held inside the company long enough for the payments to be made and the licence to be won.
- Telia treated market entry as a negotiation with whoever controlled access — an official paid directly through a shell, 'in a position to exert significant influence' over others.
- When the bill arrived, Telia still tried to bargain: after admitting the entry was 'unethical and wrongful', it called the US$1.4 billion proposal very high — then settled for US$965 million anyway.
- Four agencies shared the recovery — SEC, DOJ, the Dutch Openbaar Ministerie and the Swedish Åklagarmyndigheten — so there was no single negotiator to stall and no clean exit.
The lesson
A bribe booked as a consulting fee is still a bribe — and the fee is only the first instalment. When regulators coordinate, the real bill arrives: nearly three times what was paid.
Sources
- Yahoo Finance (AP) — Telecommunications Company Paying $965 Million For FCPA Violations (21 Sep 2017: Telia agrees US$965M global settlement with SEC, DOJ, Dutch and Swedish authorities; at least US$330M bribes to shell company under guise of lobbying/consulting payments that never occurred; shell controlled by Uzbek government official, family member of the President; US$457M SEC disgorgement, over US$508M DOJ criminal fine, offsets possible, minimum US$965M total)
- Telecompaper — Telia balks at USD 1.4 bln settlement in Uzbekistan probe (15 Sep 2016: US and Dutch authorities proposed ~US$1.4B (SEK 12B) settlement; chairman Marie Ehrling says Telia entered Uzbekistan 'in an unethical and wrongful way' but called the amount very high; investigation since spring 2014; VimpelCom settled a similar case for US$795M in Feb 2016)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Doro's 'your parents' lives may depend on this button' ad ruled fear without reason
Tele2's 'free PlayStation 5' with 24-month broadband ruled misleading
Hallon's chatbot said phone support didn't exist — a Swedish court fined the answer
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.