The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2017–2025
Alibaba put HK$50.4B into China's top hypermarket — sold it for HK$13.1B
On Jan 1, 2025 Alibaba agreed to sell its entire 78.7% Sun Art stake to DCP Capital for up to HK$13.1B — about HK$37B below what it invested.
Sun Art Retail (高鑫零售) · RT-Mart (大润发) · Alibaba (阿里巴巴) · 2025-02-27
What happened
In October 2017 Alibaba paid HK$22.4 billion for a 36.16% stake in Sun Art Retail, operator of RT-Mart, China's largest hypermarket chain — the flagship deal of its 'New Retail' doctrine of fusing online data with offline stores. In October 2020 it paid another HK$27.957 billion to lift its stake to 72% and take control. Total invested: HK$50.357 billion. The plan was digital transformation; the reality was a shrinking format — in FY2024 Sun Art's revenue fell 13.3% to ¥72.567 billion and it swung to a ¥1.668 billion net loss, closing 20 hypermarkets.
On the evening of January 1, 2025, Alibaba announced it would sell its entire 78.7% holding to DCP Capital for up to HK$13.138 billion (~¥11.8 billion) — roughly HK$37 billion below what it had put in. The exit had been signalled since the stock was suspended in September 2024; it closed on February 27, 2025. Chairman Joe Tsai had already called traditional retail non-core, and CEO Eddie Wu's framework demanded focus. Half a month earlier Alibaba had sold Intime at a ¥9.3 billion loss — together the two deals were the liquidation of New Retail.
What the retreat left: Sun Art CEO Shen Hui promised continued cooperation with Alibaba, but the empire of department stores and hypermarkets was gone except for Hema. The company that championed New Retail spent HK$50 billion to learn that an e-commerce giant cannot remake a hypermarket by buying one. The bill was settled in two announcements, one in December and one in January — the most expensive tuition in Chinese retail strategy.
Why it happened
- New Retail assumed capital plus data could remake offline retail — instead the hypermarket format kept shrinking, and FY2024 brought a ¥1.668 billion loss and 20 closures.
- Control was bought at the top: Alibaba paid HK$27.957 billion more in 2020 to go from minority owner to 72%, just as the format's decline turned irreversible.
- When the strategy reset to core business, the assets became exits — Intime sold at a ¥9.3 billion loss in December, Sun Art in January at HK$37 billion below cost.
The lesson
You can't buy a format's second life. Alibaba spent HK$50.4B to own China's biggest hypermarket chain, then sold it for HK$13.1B — New Retail's most expensive tuition.
Aftermath
DCP Capital takes over a chain that had just turned profitable at the half year — ¥206 million of net profit in the six months to September 2024 — and CEO Shen Hui says Alibaba remains an important partner. Alibaba's physical retail footprint shrank to Hema alone; capital and attention moved to AI and global expansion. Intime went at a ¥9.3 billion loss, Sun Art at about HK$37 billion below investment — two announcements, one retreat, and the end of the New Retail era.
Sources
- Jiemian News — HK$13.1B: Alibaba clears out of RT-Mart, 2025-01-06
- NetEase — Alibaba's physical retail great retreat: near HK$50B lost, 2025-03-06
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Alibaba sold Intime at a ¥9.3B loss — the end of its New Retail bet
RT-Mart was China's top hypermarket chain — it closed 20 stores and lost ¥1.6B in one year
Knocked back ten years: Pou Sheng's Nike and Adidas trap
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.