Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · People & Management · Operational decision · 2021–2024

Stellantis cut 47,500 jobs for €8.4B savings — then fired its CEO as profit fell 70%

Carlos Tavares squeezed Stellantis so hard that Jeep and Ram inventory piled up, US dealers revolted, and the board forced him out.

Stellantis · Carlos Tavares

What happened

Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares made cost-cutting his signature: €8.4 billion in savings from the PSA-FCA merger, 47,500 jobs gone between 2019 and 2023, headcount reduced 15.5%. The strategy delivered record margins in 2023 — and then consumed the company that built them.

The cuts hollowed out Stellantis's US operations, its most profitable market. Product launches slipped, dealer support dried up, and Jeep and Ram prices climbed to historic highs while competitors refreshed their lineups. US dealers publicly condemned the company; the United Auto Workers union called for Tavares's removal for months.

In September 2024, Stellantis slashed its full-year guidance. Third-quarter shipments fell 20% year-on-year and revenue dropped 27%. By December 1, the board accepted Tavares's immediate resignation, citing 'different views.' Full-year net profit fell 70% to €5.5 billion; industrial free cash flow was negative €6 billion. The stock finished 2024 down roughly 50% from its peak.

Why it happened

  • Cost-cutting targets were set centrally and enforced across all regions, but the US — Stellantis's cash engine — lost the product, dealer and engineering capacity it needed to maintain share.
  • Pricing was pushed to historic highs on aging Jeep and Ram models, which drove customers to fresher competitors and left dealers with bloated inventory they could not move.
  • Product renewal was deprioritised in favour of savings: gaps in the model lineup opened at exactly the moment GM and Ford were refreshing their trucks and SUVs.
  • Governance concentrated power in the CEO office; the board waited until September 2024, by which point Tavares had lost the dealers, the union and the US market.
What it cost€5.5B profit (–70%), negative €6B cash flowcostly

The lesson

Cost-cutting that hollows out your most profitable market is not efficiency — it is liquidation with better branding.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →