Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2018–2023

South African Airways lost money for years — and got R38B in bailouts anyway

South African Airways was kept aloft for years by government bailouts — R38 billion from 2018 alone. In December 2019 it finally entered business rescue.

South African Airways · 2019-12

What happened

South African Airways (SAA), the country's national carrier, spent years losing money and being rescued by its owner, the South African government. The funding was enormous: from April 2018 the government injected R38.1 billion into the airline, on top of bailouts stretching back many years before that. The airline kept flying, but it kept losing money, and the cost kept landing on the public purse.

By late 2019 the position was no longer sustainable. On 5 December 2019 the SAA board resolved to place the airline under business rescue — a formal process, under South Africa's companies law, to restructure a company that cannot pay its debts. The government said the aim was a 'radical restructuring' to make the airline financially and operationally sustainable and to reduce its 'ongoing impact on the fiscus', and it guaranteed billions of rand of post-commencement finance to keep the airline operating during the process.

The rescue ran for years. It was substantially implemented by 2021, and the airline eventually emerged with the help of a further R10.4 billion bailout — but it was still not on stable ground. The auditor-general's findings showed why the money had not fixed the problem: irregular expenditure at the airline had stood at R22 billion in 2017-18 and had doubled to R44.5 billion by 2022.

SAA is the textbook case of bailout dependence. Repeated injections of public money kept the airline flying without fixing the losses and mismanagement that caused them; the funding treated the symptom, and the symptom kept returning, until a formal rescue process had to step in where a decade of bailouts had not.

Why it happened

  • South African Airways lost money for years, kept operating only through repeated government bailouts — R38.1 billion injected from April 2018 alone.
  • The funding did not fix the underlying losses and mismanagement; irregular expenditure doubled from R22 billion in 2017-18 to R44.5 billion by 2022.
  • By December 2019 the airline was no longer solvent, and on 5 December its board placed it under business rescue to force a radical restructuring.
  • The airline emerged only after a further R10.4 billion bailout, and even then remained financially unstable — the bailouts had treated the symptom, not the cause.
What it costR38B+ of state funding; still not solventcatastrophic

The lesson

A bailout that doesn't fix the business just pays for the next loss. South African Airways took tens of billions of rand and still went into rescue; the money treated the symptom, not the cause.

Aftermath

SAA emerged from business rescue a much smaller airline, but its finances remained fragile and its audit outcomes stayed poor, with the auditor-general citing poor management and governance. Its story is cited as the defining example of South Africa's state-enterprise troubles: a national carrier that consumed tens of billions of rand of public money over a decade without ever becoming viable, because the funding was never paired with the reform that would have made it unnecessary.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →