Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2024

China's brokers sold $50B of 'snowball' bonds — then had to dump futures to hedge them

Snowball derivatives paid 10% coupons if an index stayed in range. When the CSI 1000 fell, brokers hedging the products sold futures, deepening the crash.

China International Capital Corporation · UBS · Bank of America · 2024-01-22

What happened

Snowball products are structured derivatives Chinese brokerages sold heavily to retail and wealthy investors from 2021 onward: buy in, and as long as a reference index like the CSI 500 or CSI 1000 stays within a set range, the product pays a bond-like coupon of around 10% a year. If the index falls through a preset 'knock-in' barrier, typically 70–80% of the starting level, the payout flips and the holder can lose most of their principal. Cinda Securities put the outstanding notional at 216 billion yuan (about $30B) in January 2024; UBS later estimated it nearer $50B.

China's small-cap indices fell hard in early 2024, and by late January roughly 40% of outstanding snowball products had breached their knock-in levels. Brokerages that sold the products hedged their exposure by holding long positions in CSI 500 and CSI 1000 stock index futures; as knock-ins triggered, they had to sell those futures to unwind the hedge, adding forced selling into an already falling market. Futures turnover on CSI 1000 contracts spiked to 93 billion yuan in a single day, against a prior monthly average of about 13 billion yuan.

A product marketed as steady income in a flat market became, at scale, an amplifier of the crash it was meant to protect against — each leg of forced hedge-unwinding pushed the index closer to the next batch of barriers. Bank of America estimated a further 6–7% decline would trigger another wave. Beijing intervened with market-support measures in the following weeks, but investors who bought snowballs at 2023 levels needed a roughly 40% index recovery within a year to avoid losing principal.

Why it happened

  • Snowball coupons were priced as if a knock-in were a tail event, but $30–50B of the same structure on the same two indices meant one downturn could trigger a large share of them together.
  • Hedging the product with index futures made sense for any one broker alone, but at aggregate scale it converted every knock-in into forced selling that pushed the index toward the next barrier.
  • A product sold as bond-like income exposed retail investors to full downside risk in the exact scenario — a broad market decline — that a comparable bond would not have carried.
What it cost$30–50B notional exposed; ~40% of products knocked incostly

The lesson

A derivative that pays like a bond in calm markets can behave like leveraged equity in a selloff — hedging it at scale with one instrument turns unwinding into the crash it protects against.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →