The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2020–2021
Sichuan Trust hid what its ¥25B trust-of-trusts products held — 8,000 stopped getting paid
Sichuan Trust sold ¥25.3B in TOT products without disclosing the assets had turned bad — 45 projects defaulted and a record fine followed.
Sichuan Trust · 2020-06
What happened
Sichuan Trust sold trust-of-trusts (TOT) products, pooling investor money into other trust plans rather than direct assets, and marketed roughly ¥25.3 billion of them across 45 projects to more than 8,000 investors. Regulators later found the company had not truthfully disclosed the risk in the underlying assets, had run trades unrelated to the products' stated purpose, and had let project funds be diverted by shareholders for other uses.
Payments began failing in June 2020, starting with products branded Furong and Shenfu; by the time the scale of the problem was clear, ¥129.9 billion of the total was due that year alone, with billions more maturing in 2021 and 2022. Sichuan's banking regulator suspended the TOT business and placed the company under direct on-site supervision, with accounting firm KPMG brought in to assess what the underlying assets were actually worth.
In February 2021 the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission fined Sichuan Trust ¥34.9 million for 13 separate violations — at the time the largest single fine in the trust industry's history, surpassing prior records held by Ping An Trust and Anxin Trust. Only a small fraction of the defaulted products had been repaid by that point.
Why it happened
- A trust-of-trusts structure adds a layer between investor and asset, and Sichuan Trust used that distance to avoid disclosing the assets behind its products had already turned into risk exposures.
- Letting project funds be diverted by shareholders meant the money backing investor products was, in part, never actually invested the way the products described.
- Selling ¥25 billion in short-dated products without matching disclosure meant the default hit all at once across 45 projects rather than surfacing gradually.
The lesson
Pooling investor money through another layer of trust products doesn't remove the risk in what's underneath — it just delays when investors find out about it.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A ¥6.3B rescue couldn't stop a ¥23.7B writedown at China's mall giant
Gome's founder surrendered the company to a creditor for HK$377M
A 90-year-old department store has ¥137M cash against ¥3.9B of short-term debt
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.