Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2000–2026

Shangpin+ opened a 30,000-sqm outlet in 2024 — it closed two years later

Beijing's discount pioneer from 2000 bet a new outlet on a site with no subway, off the core districts. It shut in April 2026; three stores remain.

Shangpin+ City Outlet (上品+城市奥莱) · 2026-04-26

What happened

Shangpin opened Beijing's first discount store in 2000 and grew the format into the Shangpin+ city-outlet brand, anchored by the Caoqiao store opened in 2013. Then, in March 2024, with offline retail already under pressure, it opened a new ~30,000-sqm outlet in Shunyi — the district's first, a standalone complex beside Renhe Park, pitched as a new retail flagship.

The new store lasted just over two years: Shunyi closed on April 2, 2026. The operator named rising rent and stubbornly high costs, and said it could not meet tenants' demands for lower fees and rent relief. The site sat away from core commercial districts with no direct metro — community foot traffic could not supply the citywide draw an outlet needs. On April 26 the 13-year-old Caoqiao store followed, with unresolved property-rights legacy problems, rent escalating, and brands demanding better terms. Shoppers' own verdict matched: inflated prices, weak discounts, famous brands disappearing.

The squeeze is structural for the urban-outlet format: city-center rents without the day-trip experience of suburban outlet malls, while livestream e-commerce eats away the 'genuine goods at low prices' advantage and hard-to-attract brands leave low-tier, homogeneous lineups. After April 2026, Shangpin+ holds three Beijing doors — Olympic Village, Wukesong, Huilongguan — and says it will refine those stores, differentiate the brand mix, run online and offline as one channel, and rebalance rent against tenant economics.

Why it happened

  • The 2024 Shunyi opening bet on a site with no direct metro, away from core districts — community traffic can't feed an outlet's citywide-draw model.
  • Costs were fixed and revenue wasn't: rising rent and high operating costs against tenants demanding fee cuts the operator couldn't grant.
  • Livestream e-commerce eroded the low-price advantage; hard recruitment left weak brands, inflated prices and thin discounts — Caoqiao's complaint sheet.
What it costTwo stores closed in one month; Beijing down to 3 doorscostly

The lesson

An outlet lives on citywide draw, not neighborhood traffic. Shangpin+ opened 30,000 sqm off the subway in 2024 and closed it in two years — while livestream pricing ate the discount model.

Aftermath

The plan is consolidation: focus on the three remaining stores, target customer segments precisely, build a differentiated brand mix and scene experience, merge online and offline channels, and rebalance the rent structure against tenant economics. The format question stays open — urban outlets pay city rents but lack the suburban day-trip draw, and the discount edge now competes with livestreams.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →