The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 1985–2009
GM built a car company that worked — then starved it for twenty years and killed it
Saturn had salaried salespeople, no-haggle pricing, and a team-based factory. Customers loved it. GM never gave it a second model worth buying.
General Motors · Saturn Corporation
HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.
What it means today
Every large company has a Saturn: the internal startup that proved the new model works, then was starved because it threatened the old one. The question is whether the parent can tolerate a child that makes it look bad.
What happened
In 1985 GM chairman Roger Smith announced Saturn Corporation as 'a different kind of car company.' The Spring Hill, Tennessee plant was built from scratch with a new labour agreement: salaried workers, team-based assembly, no job classifications. Sales were no-haggle, one-price. The first Saturn rolled off the line in 1990.
The formula worked. Saturn owners were fiercely loyal — Saturn 'homecomings' at the Spring Hill plant drew 40,000 people. J.D. Power satisfaction scores rivalled Honda's. The UAW local at Spring Hill was the most cooperative in GM. But GM never invested in a second generation. The original S-series platform, designed in the 1980s, was still in production in 2002. The cars looked and drove like relics next to the Honda Civics and Toyota Corollas they competed with.
In 2009, during GM's bankruptcy restructuring, Saturn was discontinued. The Spring Hill plant was idled. The 7,000 workers who had built the most cooperative labour-management relationship in American manufacturing were laid off. The factory floor story, as the workers tell it, is not that Saturn failed. It is that GM would not let it succeed.
Why it happened
- GM treated Saturn as an experiment, not a business. Once the concept was proved, GM lost interest in funding it. The experiment was a success; the company was a rounding error on GM's balance sheet
- The no-haggle, salaried-sales model threatened GM's dealer network. Saturn's success was an implicit criticism of GM's distribution, and internal resistance to expanding it matched external demand
- GM's product cycle was five years; Saturn needed a new model every three. The platform was never updated because capital allocation treated Saturn as a niche brand, not a growth platform
The lesson
A skunkworks that proves the concept is not a business until the parent funds the second product. Saturn proved the model worked. GM proved a parent can kill a successful child by not feeding it.
Aftermath
The Spring Hill plant was later reopened by GM to build the Cadillac SRX and other models, using a conventional labour agreement. Saturn's no-haggle pricing model was adopted by Tesla and other direct-sales manufacturers. The Saturn owner community persists online; the homecomings stopped when the brand died.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
GM's worst plant became its best under Toyota — then GM let it die
Harley let quality rot — the cure was on Honda's factory floor
Genesis G80: a loose ground bolt that stalls the engine at speed
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.