Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2005–2012

Sara Lee sold off 40% of its business — and still couldn't survive as one company

Once a household-name conglomerate, Sara Lee spent seven years shedding non-core assets for $3.7B, then split into two and was acquired within two years.

Sara Lee · 2005-02

What happened

Sara Lee was a sprawling American consumer-goods conglomerate that owned everything from cheesecake and hot dogs to shoe polish and insecticides. At its peak in the 1990s, its portfolio spanned food, beverage, household products, and branded apparel across dozens of countries. By 2004, the conglomerate structure had become a liability: the brands were too diverse to manage coherently, and the stock had underperformed for years.

In February 2005, new CEO Brenda Barnes announced a multi-year plan to divest roughly 40% of revenue and refocus on food, beverage, and household care. Over six years, Sara Lee sold European meats and apparel, spun off Hanesbrands, sold direct-selling to Tupperware, disposed of body-care to Unilever for €1.275 billion, Ambi Pur to P&G for €320 million, Kiwi shoe-care to SC Johnson for €245 million, and North American Fresh Bakery to Grupo Bimbo for $959 million. The divestments raised over $3.7 billion.

Yet the transformation never produced the focused company management had promised. In January 2011, Sara Lee announced a split into Hillshire Brands (North American meat and frozen foods) and D.E Master Blenders 1753 (international coffee and tea). The split completed on July 4, 2012. Two years later, Hillshire Brands was acquired by Tyson Foods. D.E Master Blenders was absorbed into JAB Holding's coffee empire. The Sara Lee brand was eventually sold to private equity. The conglomerate built over 70 years was dismantled in seven.

Why it happened

  • Sara Lee's conglomerate structure spread management across too many unrelated categories — food, apparel, household chemicals, shoe care — making coherent strategy impossible.
  • The 2005 transformation plan was reactive: it sold assets to raise cash but never articulated what the remaining company would be better at than competitors.
  • Divesting 40% of revenue without a growth strategy for the remainder left a company smaller but not stronger — easier to acquire than to thrive.
  • The 2011 split was widely seen by analysts as a move to facilitate a takeover, which happened within two years.
What it cost$3.7B in divestments; brand sold to PEcostly

The lesson

Shrinking a company only works when the core has a clear advantage. Sara Lee sold its way to a smaller version of the same unfocused company, then split and was acquired.

Aftermath

Hillshire Brands was acquired by Tyson Foods in 2014 for $7.7 billion. D.E Master Blenders 1753 merged with Mondelez's coffee business to form Jacobs Douwe Egberts. The remaining Sara Lee frozen-bakery business was sold to Kohlberg & Company in 2018. The brand that once defined American packaged food survives only as a frozen-dessert label under private equity.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →