Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Operational decision · 2019–2025

A standard-setting jelly maker lasted 20 years — then its factory was auctioned on JD.com

金娃食品 drafted China's jelly standard and ran a 100-mu factory. It stopped production around 2019 and was declared bankrupt in 2025.

东莞市金娃食品工业有限公司 · 2025-06-30

What happened

东莞市金娃食品工业有限公司 was founded in July 1999 in Xiegang Town, Dongguan. Its 100-mu Jinwa Industrial Park opened in 2001 and at peak employed over a thousand workers. The company was one of China's largest preservative-free jelly and pudding manufacturers, and helped draft the national jelly standard QB1432-2001 and GB19883-2005. Its products were exported to multiple countries, and in 2019 it was named to Guangdong Province's Top 500 Brand Reputation list.

But 2019 was also the year operations effectively stopped. By the time a reporter visited the factory in 2024, the campus was overgrown with weeds, machines sat idle, and expired jelly was still in the warehouses. The company's registered capital was just ¥3.09M — a strikingly thin base for a manufacturer that had once run a 100-mu industrial park. Its business scope, meanwhile, had been amended to include smart robots, smart watches, and toys alongside food production — a pivot that never materialised.

In July 2021, a supplier — 东莞市顶卓环保材料 — filed a bankruptcy liquidation petition with the Dongguan Intermediate Court. The case was assigned to the Dongguan Third People's Court in November 2021. During the proceedings, it emerged that Jinwa had signed land and property transfer contracts with three real estate companies (中惠熙元, 富旸投资, 悦旸投资) in an attempt to monetise its factory site. The court voided those contracts in 2024, and the companies had to be ordered to vacate — they had changed the locks, blocked entrances, and even kept dogs on the premises.

On 30 June 2025, the court formally declared 金娃食品 bankrupt. In November 2025, its industrial land and 14 buildings in Xiegang Town were put up for auction on JD.com. The bankruptcy case was closed at the end of December 2025.

Why it happened

  • Registered capital of only ¥3.09M behind a 100-mu factory and a thousand workers — thin equity, no buffer when the jelly market shifted.
  • Unfocused diversification into smart robots, smartwatches and toys — none of which replaced revenue from a declining jelly category.
  • Failed asset flip: tried to sell its factory land to three real estate firms, but the contracts were voided — a rescue attempt became litigation.
  • Preservative-free positioning meant shorter shelf life and higher costs — a structural disadvantage as low-cost competitors undercut on price.
What it cost100-mu factory and 14 buildings auctioned; company dissolvedcostly

The lesson

Drafting the industry standard is not a moat. A thin capital base, a failed asset flip, and category drift can take down a 20-year manufacturer that once set the rules.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →