The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Strategic decision · 1987–1995
Sampoong: South Korea's deadliest collapse — 502 dead, boss wanted a mall
Sampoong Group turned an apartment building into a mall mid-build. Columns cut, AC units dragged onto the roof, warnings ignored — 502 dead.
Sampoong Group · 1995-06-29
What happened
The Sampoong Department Store in Seoul's Seocho District was originally designed in 1987 as a four-story residential apartment building. Before construction was complete, chairman Lee Joon ordered a redesign into a five-story department store. The change required removing support columns to install escalators, reducing column diameter from 80 cm to 60 cm, and halving the steel reinforcement from 16 bars to 8. The fifth floor was fitted with a heavy ondol heating system encased in a 1.2-meter thick concrete slab — far exceeding the floor's designed load capacity.
In 1993, three 15-tonne air conditioning units were dragged across the roof, causing visible cracks. They were placed directly over column 5E, the eventual point of failure. By April 1995, cracks had appeared in the fifth-floor ceiling. On the morning of June 29, the ceiling began sinking. Experts warned the building was at risk of imminent collapse. Management responded by moving merchandise from the fifth floor to the basement — and refused to close the store or evacuate. Lee Joon personally rejected evacuation orders to avoid losing a day's revenue.
At 5:52 PM on June 29, 1995, the roof collapsed, pancaking the five floors into the basement. 502 people died and 937 were injured — the deadliest building collapse in South Korean history and the second deadliest department store disaster globally. Lee Joon was sentenced to 10.5 years for criminal negligence; his son Lee Han-sang, the store's CEO, received 7 years. Compensation payouts totaled ₩375.8 billion (~$300 million).
Why it happened
- Lee Joon changed the building from apartments to a mall mid-construction. Support columns were cut for escalators, diameter reduced from 80 to 60 cm, steel rebar halved — all to save costs.
- Three 15-tonne AC units dragged across the roof cracked the structure and were placed over the column that would fail. The 1.2m-thick concrete floor slab exceeded the building's load capacity.
- On the day of the collapse, experts warned the building was unstable. Management closed part of the fifth floor but refused to evacuate — Lee Joon said losing a day's sales was too costly.
- The disaster killed 502 and injured 937 — the deadliest peacetime disaster in South Korea. Lee Joon received 10.5 years for criminal negligence.
The lesson
When expert engineers tell you a building is about to collapse, you evacuate. Lee Joon refused because he did not want to lose a day's revenue. 502 people died as a result.
Aftermath
Lee Joon was sentenced to 10.5 years for criminal negligence, reduced to 7.5 years. He was released on medical parole in 1998 and died in 2003. His son Lee Han-sang received 7 years. Two city officials were convicted of accepting bribes to approve the illegal design changes. The disaster led to a review of South Korea's building safety regulations and exposed widespread corruption in construction approvals. The collapse remains the deadliest building disaster in South Korean peacetime history.
Sources
- Wikipedia — Sampoong Department Store collapse (built 1987-1990 residential→mall conversion; columns cut from 80→60 cm; rebar halved from 16→8; 1.2m concrete floor on 5th floor; 3×15-ton AC units on roof; 502 dead, 937 injured; Lee Joon sentenced 10.5 yrs; Lee Han-sang 7 yrs)
- The Guardian — Learning from Seoul's Sampoong Department Store disaster (2015)
- BBC News — Safety: The price of miracle development? (30 June 1999)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Hyundai's front camera software slammed the brakes for nothing — 421,000 cars recalled
Kakao ran South Korea's messaging on one data center — a fire took the country offline
Hyundai and Kia's Theta II engine: metal debris, then a $1.3B settlement
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.