Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2020

RT-Mart's size chart called XL women 'utterly rotten' — the apology didn't land either

A store poster mapped women's sizes to S=slim, M=beautiful, L=rotten, XL=utterly rotten — and 'girls 18–35 only'. RT-Mart apologised; users refused.

RT-Mart (大润发) · Sun Art Retail (高鑫零售) · 2020-11-12

What happened

In November 2020 a 'women's size suggestion chart' from an RT-Mart store spread across Chinese social media: sizes S, M, L, XL and XXL mapped to 'slim', 'beautiful', 'rotten', 'utterly rotten' and 'utterly rotten' respectively, with a note reading 'for girls aged 18–35 only; consult staff about your figure first'. A fitting-room aid had become body-shaming and age exclusion in one poster.

The topic hit Weibo's trending list immediately; critics accused the chain of dressing contempt up as humour. On 12 November RT-Mart apologised, calling the wording inappropriate and the act of an individual store; the poster was taken down and headquarters promised tighter internal management. Many users said they did not accept the apology, noting nobody was held responsible — 'vulgarity passed off as humour' stuck to the brand.

Why it happened

  • The copy was the mistake: mapping sizes to insults is not edgy humour, it is a retailer publicly ranking customers' bodies
  • Double exclusion: the '18–35 only' age limit turned body-shaming into age discrimination in the same poster
  • A head-office apology blaming 'one store' rang hollow — the material had passed a review chain to be printed and hung
What it costTrending backlash; poster pulled; apology rejected by usersembarrassing

The lesson

Store-level copy is brand-level speech: one poster ranking women's bodies cost a national chain its trending page and an apology users refused to accept.

Aftermath

The poster came down the day it trended. RT-Mart's apology statement survives as a stock example of body-shaming marketing in Chinese retail training.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →