Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2025

Prada Kolhapuri sandal sparked cultural appropriation crisis — legal threats, forced pivot

Prada faced cultural appropriation accusations in June 2025 after selling €1,200 sandals that copied India's GI-tagged Kolhapuri chappals without credit.

Prada · 2025-06-22

What happened

In June 2025, Prada unveiled a pair of toe-loop leather sandals at Milan Fashion Week during its Spring/Summer 2026 menswear show. The sandals, priced at over €1,000 ($1,200), closely resembled India's traditional Kolhapuri chappals — handcrafted leather sandals that have been made in Maharashtra for centuries and carry a Geographical Indication (GI) tag. Prada initially described them simply as "leather sandals" with no mention of their Indian inspiration.

Indian politicians, artisans, and civil society groups immediately accused Prada of cultural appropriation. Social media erupted with hashtags like #KolhapuriChappals, while Bollywood star Kareena Kapoor Khan posted a photo of her own traditional chappals with the caption "Sorry not Prada…but my OG Kolhapuri." The Maharashtra Chamber of Commerce threatened legal action, and a member of parliament organized Kolhapuri sandal makers to file a lawsuit in the Bombay High Court. Prada was served a legal notice seeking damages of ₹500 crore.

Prada initially responded through Lorenzo Bertelli, its head of corporate social responsibility, acknowledging the Indian inspiration and committing to "responsible design practices." By April 2026, the company launched a limited-edition "Made in India" line of Kolhapuri-inspired sandals priced at €750, produced by artisans in Maharashtra and Karnataka, alongside a three-year training programme for 180 artisans. The episode highlighted how even a global luxury house can face significant backlash when it fails to credit the cultural sources of its designs.

Why it happened

  • Prada copied India's GI-tagged Kolhapuri chappals without credit, priced 100× the original, triggering accusations of exploitation and cultural theft.
  • Prada's silence and failure to credit Indian artisans let the controversy escalate into legal threats, a boycott campaign, and a forced public acknowledgment.
  • Prada lacked a system to vet designs for cultural provenance, repeating the pattern of its 2018 blackface controversy.
What it cost₹500-crore legal notice; product pivot; artisan programmecostly

The lesson

Failing to credit cultural sources in design is not just a PR risk — it can trigger legal action, boycott campaigns, and force a costly product pivot regardless of brand size or market position.

Aftermath

Prada launched a limited-edition Made in India sandal line in April 2026, produced by Indian artisans and sold at €750 across 40 stores. The company also funded a three-year training programme for 180 Indian artisans. The Prada Group reported 14% revenue growth in early 2026, indicating the controversy did not materially affect overall financial performance.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →