Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026

Plucharm's 'Nobel-winning' hair tonic ads faked proof and a sell-out

Tokyo ordered Plucharm to stop ads faking a Nobel-level hair tonic — built on agency-made photos, invented SNS testimonials and a false sell-out.

Plucharm · 2026-03-23

What happened

Plucharm sold its quasi-drug hair tonic 'イクモアナノグロウリッチ' by mail order through websites reached from Instagram ads. The copy claimed anyone could easily achieve visibly stronger hair, and even suggested the product had effects 'grand enough to win a Nobel Prize' — a line built only on the fact that a 20th-century vitamin researcher had won one.

The before-and-after photos on the site were not real results: the company's ad agency had synthesised and modelled images, pairing thin-hair shots onto model photos. 'Testimonials' from supposed SNS account holders were likewise written by the agency, not actual users. On its own sales page, Plucharm claimed stock had sold out repeatedly in late 2024 and was nearly gone in January 2025, when substantial inventory actually existed.

On 23 March 2026 the Tokyo Metropolitan Government issued an administrative order under the Act Against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, finding superior-quality misrepresentation (Article 5(1)) and stealth-marketing violations (Article 5(3)): the site did not disclose it was Plucharm's own advertising, and the 'hair diagnostician' quoted was a company employee. The evidence Plucharm submitted to justify the effect claims was held not to be reasonable.

Why it happened

  • Describing a hair tonic as Nobel Prize-worthy on the strength of a long-dead scientist's prize
  • Posting ad-agency-fabricated before/after images as if they were customer results
  • Inventing SNS testimonials that no real user had written
  • Faking sell-outs to push purchases of stock that was plentiful
  • Quoting a 'hair diagnostician' who was the company's own employee, without saying so
What it costTokyo order; fake-effect and fabricated-proof ads bannedembarrassing

The lesson

When the proof is fabricated, the whole claim collapses. Inventing testimonials, compositing before/after photos and faking a sell-out hands a regulator the open-and-shut case for you.

Aftermath

Tokyo ordered Plucharm to notify consumers of the violation, stop the misleading displays, and institute recurrence-prevention measures among its officers and employees. The ruling is one of the fullest Tokyo orders of 2026, bundling fabricated imagery, ghost testimonials and false scarcity into a single misrepresentation finding.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →