Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Marketing decision · 2012

Orbitz showed Mac users pricier hotels — and called it personalisation

Mac users spent $20–30 more per night, so Orbitz sorted their results toward four- and five-star hotels. The WSJ called it price steering.

Orbitz Worldwide · 2012-06

What happened

In June 2012 the Wall Street Journal reported that Orbitz, the online travel agency, was showing Mac users different hotel search results from PC users. Mac users were 40% more likely to book four- or five-star hotels and spent $20–30 more per night, so Orbitz sorted their results toward pricier options.

Orbitz insisted it was not charging different prices for the same room — the difference was in sort order, not price. Mac users could still find cheaper hotels by scrolling. The CEO was publicly proud of the practice, calling it predictive analytics working as intended.

The story triggered a broader debate about whether data-driven personalisation crosses a line when it steers customers toward spending more. Regulators and consumer advocates questioned the practice, and Orbitz became the textbook example of 'price steering' in the personalisation debate.

Why it happened

  • A correlation (Mac owners spend more) was treated as a licence to steer, not merely to recommend — the line between the two was never drawn internally.
  • The CEO defended the practice publicly instead of acknowledging the optics, turning a product decision into a PR story.
  • No one asked whether customers would feel manipulated if the sorting logic were printed on the search page.
What it costbrand became the textbook case of steeringembarrassing

The lesson

Personalisation that only benefits the seller reads as manipulation. If the logic embarrasses you on a front page, it will embarrass you on one.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →