Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2021–2022

Oatly's green ads were banned — it compared its best product to milk's worst number

Oatly claimed 73% less CO2 than milk, but only tested one product against whole milk. The ASA banned four claims in its biggest UK campaign.

Oatly · 2022-01-26

What happened

In January 2021, Oatly launched its biggest UK campaign: two TV ads, paid social posts and national press ads, all built on environmental claims. The headline was that Oatly generates 73% less CO2e than milk. The social posts went further, claiming the dairy and meat industries emit more CO2e than all the world's planes, trains, cars and boats combined. The campaign drew 109 complaints, including from the campaign group A Greener World.

The ASA upheld four of five complaints. The 73% figure was real but narrow: it compared one product (Oatly Barista Edition) against whole cow's milk, while the ad implied it covered all Oatly products and all milk. The transport comparison used a full life cycle for meat and dairy but only direct-use emissions for transport, making the gap look larger than it was. A press claim that 'meat and dairy' account for more than half of food emissions quietly included eggs, fish and shellfish in the category.

The fourth upheld claim was the most revealing: Oatly stated that cutting dairy and meat was 'the single biggest lifestyle change' to reduce environmental impact, presenting one researcher's opinion as scientific consensus and dropping his qualifying word 'probably'. The ads were banned. Oatly said it would not repeat the transport claim.

Why it happened

  • Oatly's marketing team selected the most favourable comparison (Barista Edition vs whole milk) and presented it as if it covered the whole range.
  • The transport claim mixed a full life cycle on one side with a partial one on the other — a methodological error that made the gap look decisive when it was 0.1 gigatonnes.
  • The campaign treated environmental claims as copywriting rather than data: each claim was technically sourced but framed to mislead.
What it costfour claims banned; 109 complaintsembarrassing

The lesson

An environmental claim is only as honest as its denominator. Oatly's numbers were real; the framing was designed to make a narrow result look universal.

Aftermath

The ruling became a reference case for the ASA's crackdown on greenwashing in food and drink advertising. Oatly's IPO in May 2021 had already drawn scrutiny for its sustainability messaging; the ASA ruling confirmed that the marketing had outrun the evidence.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →