The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2014
Nikon blamed China's smog for the D600's black spots — until CCTV's 3·15 gala
Black spots reappeared after every cleaning; Nikon blamed the environment. After the 2014 3·15 gala: two apologies, the D600 pulled from shelves in a day.
Nikon · 2014-03-15
What happened
The D600, Nikon's lightweight full-frame of 2012, put black spots on photos: dust and oil from the shutter mechanism landing on the sensor. Owners cleaned, repaired, and the spots returned. Nikon's service answer was the environment — dust, sand, and for China, smog: the haze users breathed was blamed for the haze on their sensors.
On March 15, 2014, CCTV's 3·15 gala put the D600 on national television: owners showing spotted frames, repairs that failed, and a manager who blamed the user's environment before conceding, under questioning, that it might be a defect. Within a day Nikon China had pulled the D600 from shelves nationwide and promised to bear every cost; on March 17 it apologised formally — free inspection and repair regardless of warranty, and a new replacement body where cleaning could not cure it.
The smog explanation was the mistake, not just the defect: a full-frame camera is sealed against the world by design, and blaming the air made Nikon look like it would blame the customer. The apology traded a repair policy for a pulled product — the D600 never returned to Chinese shelves.
Why it happened
- The service script read user environment before product defect — cleanings stacked up while the shutter kept shedding, because the first explanation protected the brand, not the camera
- Blaming smog in the world's most smog-sensitive market turned a repair case into an insult case — the explanation travelled further than the defect
- It took a national TV gala to move from 'environment' to 'we will bear all costs' in 24 hours — the speed of the reversal was the evidence that the first position was never an investigation
The lesson
Blaming the customer's environment for a sealed product's defect is an explanation with an expiry date — the faster the reversal after exposure, the more the first answer cost.
Sources
- 新浪科技 — 尼康致歉中国消费者：D600超保修期仍免费保修 可换新 (Mar 2014)
- 央视网 — 2014央视315晚会：尼康相机拍照现黑斑点 推责给雾霾 (Mar 2014)
- 央视经济 — 尼康致歉中国消费者：D600超保修期仍免费保修 可更换新机 (Mar 2014)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Anker PowerConf S3: a recall that burned two years after the notice
Xiaomi recalled 146,891 power banks, then sued its battery supplier
A Romoss power bank caught fire mid-flight and forced a diversion
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.