The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
Neoph secretly paid 237 influencers to post reviews — KFTC ordered it to stop
Ad agency Neoph worked with 237 paid influencers who posted reviews with no ad disclosure — 2,337 posts in all. Korea's KFTC ordered it to stop.
Neoph · 2025-09-19
What happened
Neoph, a South Korean advertising agency formerly called Urban Fast, ran a service that disguised paid influencer recommendations as genuine consumer posts. It recruited 237 influencers through its KakaoTalk channels and told them outright not to mark the posts as ads.
The influencers were paid in free meals or copywriting fees of 50,000-100,000 won, but the disclosure of the economic relationship that the law requires was deliberately left off. Neoph even contacted influencers to take down any disclosure posted by mistake.
Over roughly three and a half years (July 2020 to December 2023) the operation produced 2,337 undisclosed ads for 209 advertisers across food, lodging and other categories.
The Korea Fair Trade Commission ruled the posts deceptive advertising under the Fair Labeling and Advertising Act and issued a corrective order. Because Neoph halted the service during the investigation and deleted the posts itself, it escaped a fine.
Why it happened
- An instruction to hide the disclosure is the company writing down its own deception
- Paid praise that looks like a stranger's honest opinion is the hardest kind of lie to spot
- The fine was waived only because the agency removed the evidence it was caught for
The lesson
A paid recommendation stays an ad whether or not the reader is told. Hidden payment is the one fact that would change a reader's trust — telling influencers to leave it out is the deception itself.
Aftermath
The KFTC issued a corrective order against Neoph, an ad agency formerly called Urban Fast, for arranging 2,337 undisclosed paid influencer reviews for 209 advertisers between July 2020 and December 2023. It recruited 237 influencers through its KakaoTalk channels, paid them in free meals or fees of up to 100,000 won, and instructed them not to mark the posts as ads. The commission ruled this deceptive advertising under the Fair Labeling and Advertising Act. Because Neoph stopped the service during the investigation and voluntarily deleted and corrected the posts, it was not fined.
Sources
- 연합뉴스 (Yonhap) — (주)네오프의 부당한 SNS 후기 광고행위 제재
- KFTC press release — unfair SNS review advertising by Neoph
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
A court injunction froze NewJeans — and their advertisers moved on within weeks
Marketit paid influencers to post reviews of products they'd never used
Ten Korean brands dropped Kim Seon-ho in 24 hours — then had to reinstate him
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.