Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Strategic decision · 2000–2001

Moulinex died on 11 September 2001 — France's other September 11

El.Fi took 74 percent of Moulinex, then refused the recapitalisation; the group filed on 7 September 2001, four days before the world looked away.

Moulinex · El.Fi · Groupe SEB

HearsayWidely repeated, and we cannot show you a document for it. Read it for the lesson, not as fact.

What it means today

Before merging into a group that promises the rescue, ask who signs when the rescue is due. Moulinex gave its majority shareholder both roles; when the recapitalisation came, the refusal was unanswerable — and 5,600 jobs had no second bidder.

What happened

Moulinex, the French appliance maker that had bought Germany's Krups in 1991, went looking for European scale in 2000. In March the Italian group El.Fi — the holding company behind Brandt — took 25 percent of the capital, then 74; on 22 December 2000 the two merged into Moulinex-Brandt. The plan needed money the group did not have: when the restructuring was announced in April 2001, with six plant closures including three in France, the group's debt was at its maximum.

The rescue depended on the shareholder. El.Fi, now at 74.3 percent, refused to subscribe to the recapitalisation needed to finance the restructuring plan. On 7 September 2001 Moulinex-Brandt filed; the commercial court of Nanterre opened receivership proceedings with six months of observation. Four days later — the Tuesday that became the other September 11 — management ordered the total cessation of activity, and 5,600 employees were being dismissed.

The debt stood at seven billion francs at the moment of filing, as the Senate record put it — a disaster not without those responsible. On 22 October the Nanterre court chose Groupe SEB's offer over the American Fidei's: SEB took three quarters of Moulinex's activities, but only 1,850 employees out of 5,600; the other plants closed, and Basse-Normandie, the company's historical cradle, called it a trauma.

The collapse is still told as l'autre 11 septembre. Thierry Lepaon, the CGT delegate who represented the staff on the board, spent ten years writing its memoir — Moulinex, d'un monde à l'autre (Éd. Ouest-France, 2021): 'Two worlds were collapsing: the one we could imagine, and the industrial world with Moulinex. It is not the same tragedy, but we lived both on the same day, at the same hour.' The former employees' own phrase is double peine — two punishments, one morning.

Why it happened

  • The merger made one shareholder both owner and rescue: El.Fi held 74 percent, and the restructuring plan lived or died by its signature — which never came.
  • Seven billion francs of debt at filing; the April plan that closed six plants bought time the balance sheet did not have.
  • The date decided the memory: the attacks of 11 September 2001 eclipsed the fall of a national industrial name, and the workers carried both at once.
What it cost7bn francs of debt; 3,750 of 5,600 jobscostly

The lesson

When a restructuring depends on one signature, the company has one creditor left. Moulinex's majority shareholder refused to sign — and five weeks later the group filed.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →