Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2011

Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley lost ¥145B on proprietary derivatives — and cut 750 jobs

Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley's securities joint venture misjudged markets and lost ¥145B on proprietary derivatives trading in Q1 2011.

Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities · 2011-04-21

What happened

Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities was a securities joint venture formed in 2010 between Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Japan's largest bank, and Morgan Stanley, the American investment bank. The venture combined MUFJ's domestic brokerage with Morgan Stanley's investment banking capabilities, and was expected to compete with Japan's top securities firms.

In the fiscal year ending March 2011, the company recorded a net loss of ¥145 billion (approximately $1.8 billion), with nearly ¥100 billion of that coming from proprietary derivatives trading losses in the January-March quarter alone. Executive officer Koji Nishimoto explained that the firm had misjudged market conditions and that losses expanded as it tried to unwind the positions. The scale of the loss was staggering for a newly formed joint venture — it wiped out the firm's capital base.

The aftermath was severe. The company announced a business improvement plan that included sharply reducing proprietary trading, cutting 750 jobs, and receiving a ¥30 billion capital injection from parent Mitsubishi UFJ Securities Holdings. The joint venture's reputation was damaged from the start, and the loss demonstrated that combining two powerful institutions did not guarantee competent risk management.

Why it happened

  • The firm misjudged markets in early 2011 and made large directional bets on proprietary derivatives. When markets moved against the positions, the losses expanded as unwinding was delayed.
  • The joint venture structure created a governance gap: experienced traders from both legacy firms operated with overlapping mandates and unclear risk limits, allowing oversized positions to build up.
  • The loss of ¥145 billion exceeded the firm's capital base, requiring a ¥30 billion parent injection. A newly formed venture should not have been taking risks that could destroy it.
What it cost¥145B loss ($1.8B); 750 jobs cut; ¥30B injection from parentcostly

The lesson

A joint venture that combines two prestigious brands does not inherit their risk management. It inherits their blind spots. When neither parent fully owns the risk, nobody owns it.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →