Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2017

Microsoft spent $15B+ on Windows Phone — and got 0.1% market share

Microsoft invested over $15B in Windows Phone, including the $7.2B Nokia acquisition. By 2017, the platform had 0.1% market share. Nadella killed it.

Microsoft · Nokia · 2017-10

What happened

Microsoft invested over $15 billion in its Windows Phone platform, including the $7.2 billion acquisition of Nokia's phone business in 2014. The goal was to create a third mobile ecosystem alongside iOS and Android, with Microsoft's services (Office, Outlook, OneDrive) as the differentiator.

But the app gap was insurmountable. Developers built for iOS and Android because that's where the users were; users chose iOS and Android because that's where the apps were. Windows Phone's market share never exceeded 3-4% globally, and by 2017 it had fallen to 0.1%.

In October 2017, Microsoft effectively conceded defeat, announcing it would no longer develop new Windows Phone hardware or features. The company pivoted to putting its services (Office, Outlook, Teams) on iOS and Android — the platforms it had tried to compete with. The case illustrated the futility of trying to build a third ecosystem in a two-player market, and the wisdom of eventually joining the platforms you cannot beat.

Why it happened

  • The app gap was insurmountable: developers built for iOS and Android, and users followed the apps.
  • Windows Phone's market share never exceeded 3-4% and fell to 0.1% by 2017.
  • The $7.2B Nokia acquisition did not solve the ecosystem problem.
  • Microsoft pivoted to putting its services on iOS and Android — the platforms it had tried to compete with.
What it cost$15B+ invested; 0.1% market share; platform killedcostly

The lesson

In a two-player platform market, the third player dies. Windows Phone had money, engineering and a giant behind it, and still got 0.1%.

Aftermath

Microsoft killed Windows Phone and pivoted to services on iOS and Android. Satya Nadella's cloud-first strategy made Microsoft a $2T+ company. The case is cited as an example of knowing when to stop fighting a losing battle and redirect resources.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →