Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Operational decision · 2010–2012

Michelin recalled 800,000 tires over tread separation — a defect built over two years

Michelin's BFGoodrich and Uniroyal light-truck tires could shed their tread and lose air fast. About 800,000, made over two and a half years, were recalled.

Michelin · 2012

What happened

On 26 July 2012, Michelin's North American unit, Michelin Americas Small Tires, recalled approximately 800,000 light-truck tires in the U.S. market. They were sold under two of Michelin's brands, the BFGoodrich Commercial T/A A/S and the Uniroyal Laredo HD/H, in two 16-inch Load Range E sizes.

The defect was a separation at the tread belt. In its recall report to U.S. safety regulators, Michelin said the tires could lose tread, and in some cases lose air rapidly, presenting a risk to motor vehicle safety. A tread separation at speed can cause a driver to lose control of the vehicle.

The affected tires were not a single bad batch. The production periods Michelin reported to regulators ran from early 2010 into mid-2012 — roughly two and a half years of output. The flaw was built into the product across that whole window before the recall was filed.

Michelin reported no crashes or injuries, and the recall was voluntary. But for a company whose brand is built on safety, some 800,000 tires carrying a tread-separation risk are a reputational wound as well as a logistical one. The size of the recall was the measure of how long the defect had gone undetected.

Why it happened

  • The defect was a tread-belt separation, a manufacturing failure that lets the tread detach from the tire body — the one failure a tire maker most needs to prevent
  • The affected tires spanned production from early 2010 to mid-2012, so the flaw was systemic across the line rather than confined to a batch that could be quietly replaced
  • A recall of about 800,000 tires is the cost of a defect that ran for years before detection; the longer the window, the larger the population at risk
  • For a brand that markets safety as its core promise, a tread-separation recall damages the reputation directly, beyond the cost of replacing the tires
What it cost~800,000 tires recalled; tread-separation riskcostly

The lesson

A defect spanning two years of production is not a bad batch but a process that stopped catching itself. The longer a flaw runs undetected, the bigger the recall and the deeper the wound to the brand.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →