The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 1987
Merrill Lynch lost $280M on IO/PO mortgage trades — an early derivatives disaster
Merrill Lynch lost $280M in 1987 trading mortgage IO/PO strips — an early lesson that complex derivatives can blow up even the biggest firms.
Merrill Lynch · 1987-03
What happened
Merrill Lynch was one of Wall Street's most prestigious investment banks. In the mid-1980s, its mortgage desk built massive positions in interest-only (IO) and principal-only (PO) mortgage-backed securities — complex derivatives that split mortgage cash flows into separate bets on interest rate direction.
The mortgage desk was betting that interest rates would fall, which would make IO strips more valuable. Instead, rates rose unexpectedly in early 1987, and the highly leveraged IO positions collapsed. The desk's value-at-risk models had severely underestimated the potential losses from a rate move.
Merrill Lynch announced a $280 million loss from the mortgage trading — one of the largest single trading losses on Wall Street at the time. The loss shocked the financial world because Merrill was considered one of the most sophisticated mortgage traders.
The incident was a landmark early warning about the dangers of complex mortgage derivatives. It foreshadowed many of the dynamics that would later drive the 2008 financial crisis, including excessive leverage, model risk, and concentration in mortgage-backed securities.
Why it happened
- Merrill's mortgage desk made a concentrated leveraged bet on interest rate direction using IO/PO strips, with no hedge against a rate move the wrong way.
- Value-at-risk models failed to capture the true risk of the IO positions, understating how much a rate rise would cost the desk.
- Merrill's management allowed the mortgage desk to build a position so large that a single quarter's loss was material to the entire firm.
The lesson
Mortgage derivatives are leveraged bets on interest rates. Merrill Lynch lost $280M learning that IO strips can strip a firm of its profits as fast as they create them.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
eToro's $52 IPO broke down: shares fell 43% to below $30 within nine months
Winklevosses' Gemini crypto exchange IPO fell ~80% and drew a class action
Figma's IPO popped 250% on day one, then fell ~81% from its peak
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.