Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2023–2026

Medik8's SPF50+: a premium sunscreen that protected less than labelled

Independent tests found protection below the SPF50+ label — sunburn and skin-cancer risk. Sold Aug 2023–Mar 2026 in AU/NZ; TGA statement; full refund.

Medik8 · 2026-04-08

What happened

AC Newco, owner of Medik8, voluntarily recalled its Physical Sunscreen SPF50+ line — the 60mL retail and professional tubes and the 15mL Try Me size, batches A1798A/B and A2651/A/B — after independent testing indicated protection below the labelled SPF50+.

The formula is safe but under-protective: higher sunburn risk and weaker long-term skin-cancer prevention for buyers who paid up to $106 a tube. The products sold in Australia and New Zealand from August 2023 to March 2026; the TGA issued a statement and return instructions.

Owners stop use and claim a full refund with photo evidence or proof of purchase — three summers of label trust, tested late.

Why it happened

  • Independent testing found protection below the SPF50+ label — sunburn and skin-cancer prevention risk; voluntary recall Apr 2026, TGA statement
  • Sold at a premium — up to $106 a tube — for 31 months across Australia and New Zealand before the test caught the label
  • The formula is safe but weak — the defect is the number on the front, not the chemistry in the tube
What it cost31 months of SPF50+ that wasn'tcostly

The lesson

Sunscreen sells a number. When the number is the marketing and the test comes three summers later, every tube sold was a promise the skin already paid for.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →