Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025

MedExpress's 'I wish I knew sooner' ad — the post-baby jab pitch that sold regret

An ad sold new mothers regret over 'post-baby weight'. The ASA banned it for exploiting body-image insecurity and pushing prescription-only jabs.

MedExpress · 2025-12-17

What happened

On 21 June 2025 a paid-for Instagram ad for UK online pharmacy MedExpress showed a woman taking full-length mirror selfies with the overlay 'I wish I knew sooner that I could lose post-baby weight with a medicated weight loss treatment from MedExpress'. The video closed on two blue MedExpress boxes headed 'Your Weight Loss, Your Way', with small print noting treatments were subject to approval by a certified healthcare professional, and a 'Learn more' button led — through an over-18 pop-up — to a landing page naming the prescription-only weight-loss injections Mounjaro and Wegovy.

The ASA ruled on 17 December 2025 that the ad breached the CAP Code on both challenges. The 'I wish I knew sooner' framing implied the viewer had already missed an opportunity, encouraging new mothers to prioritise losing weight soon after birth with medication that carried safety warnings for people who were breast-feeding. The regulator found the ad exploited insecurities around body image and perpetuated pressure to conform to body image stereotypes, breaching rules 1.3 (social responsibility) and 4.9 (harm and offence).

The second breach was advertising prescription-only medicines (POMs) to the public: the ad referred to 'a medicated weight loss treatment' and its landing page named Mounjaro and Wegovy, both POMs, while the age gate only confirmed the visitor was over 18. The MHRA told the ASA it was concerned that a direct link to a page naming POMs 'could be analogous to a website homepage, which should not reference named POMs'. Breaching rule 12.12, the ad must not appear again in the form complained of.

Why it happened

  • 'I wish I knew sooner' sells regret: the copy manufactured the very insecurity — that new mothers were falling behind — which the product then offered to fix
  • The age gate proved only that the viewer was over 18, not that they had any medical need, so the ad functioned as public promotion of prescription-only medicines, which is illegal in the UK
  • The medicine carried breastfeeding safety warnings, so the ad pushed weight loss at the moment the product was riskiest for its target audience
What it costad banned; must not appear againembarrassing

The lesson

An ad built on regret — 'you should have started sooner' — exploits insecurity instead of informing. When the product is prescription-only, pointing the public at it from the ad is a separate breach.

Aftermath

MedExpress said it had 'strengthened our internal sign-off processes, introduced additional sensitivity checks, and enhanced advertising governance'. The ASA banned two more weight-loss ads the same day: CheqUp's Facebook ad ('I don't want to be skinny, I just don't want to be the biggest person in the room'), which 'emphasised physical appearance rather than health', and SkinnyJab's founder video, ruled an advert, not an educational resource, barring the name 'SkinnyJab' from marketing. The ASA warned the 'scale of the problem' could worsen with New Year; all three firms removed the ads.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →