Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Operational decision · 2010

Harvard's star psychologist faked data — and eight counts of misconduct ended his career

Harvard found Marc Hauser guilty of eight counts of scientific misconduct. He resigned in 2011, and papers were retracted.

Harvard University · 2010-08

What happened

Marc Hauser was a star professor at Harvard University, holding appointments in psychology, evolutionary biology, and anthropology. He ran the Cognitive Evolution Laboratory, where he studied animal cognition and the origins of human morality. His work was widely cited and earned him a reputation as one of the leading thinkers in evolutionary psychology.

In 2007, Harvard launched an internal investigation after former students and research assistants alleged that Hauser had fabricated data and manipulated experimental results. The investigation took three years. On August 20, 2010, Harvard's dean confirmed that Hauser had committed eight counts of scientific misconduct — three involving published papers and five involving unpublished studies. The misconduct included data fabrication, manipulating experimental results, and incorrectly describing how studies were conducted.

Hauser took a leave of absence in 2010 and was barred from teaching in Harvard's psychology department in April 2011. He resigned his faculty position, effective August 1, 2011. In September 2012, the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) found he committed misconduct in four NIH grants, including fabricating data and falsifying inter-observer reliability values. He agreed to a three-year supervision period and could not serve on PHS committees. The case damaged Harvard's reputation and became a cautionary tale about the pressure to produce groundbreaking results.

Why it happened

  • Hauser was a star researcher whose reputation protected him from scrutiny — Harvard's investigation took three years, and the misconduct went on for years before it was discovered.
  • The pressure to produce groundbreaking results in a competitive field like evolutionary psychology created an environment where data manipulation was rewarded until it was caught.
  • Harvard's initial response was slow: the investigation began in 2007 but the findings were not announced until 2010, giving Hauser years to continue publishing.
What it costHarvard reputation damaged, papers retracted, career endedcostly

The lesson

A star researcher whose reputation shields him from scrutiny is a liability — the institution that protects him today will be damaged by his misconduct tomorrow.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →