Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2021

Manyavar's Alia Bhatt ad questioned a ritual — #BoycottManyavar trended within hours

A bridal-wear ad had Alia Bhatt ask why only daughters are 'given away' at weddings. Hindu groups called it an attack on tradition, not a product pitch.

Manyavar · 2021-09

What happened

In September 2021, the Indian menswear and bridal brand Manyavar released an ad for its Mohey line featuring the actress Alia Bhatt at a wedding mandap. In it, she questions the Hindu ritual of 'kanyadaan' — where a bride's father formally 'gives away' his daughter to the groom's family — asking 'Am I a thing to be donated? Why only kanyadaan?' The ad proposes 'kanyamaan' (respect for the daughter) as an alternative, and ends with the groom's parents performing a reciprocal gesture.

The hashtag #BoycottManyavar trended on Indian Twitter within a day. Critics called the ad 'anti-Hindu propaganda' and 'forced feminism,' arguing it misrepresented a ritual that, in their reading, was never about property. The Hindu Janajagruti Samiti staged protests outside a Manyavar showroom and demanded an unconditional apology. The actress Kangana Ranaut urged brands to stop using religion and majority-minority politics to sell products.

Supporters, including women's rights commentators, praised the ad for naming a real discomfort inside a wedding ritual. Manyavar defended the campaign as promoting a more equal space for women in marriage while claiming to remain respectful of tradition, and did not withdraw it — unlike Tanishq and Fabindia, whose own festive-season ads had been pulled after similar campaigns that same year.

Why it happened

  • The ad put a religious ritual's wording on trial in a 60-second commercial, which read to a segment of the audience as the brand lecturing them on their own faith rather than selling clothes.
  • It arrived days after Fabindia's Diwali ad had already been pulled under similar pressure, so any brand touching Hindu ritual language in that window met an audience already primed to react.
  • The reciprocal gesture at the end tried to soften the challenge but came after the provocative line had already spread on its own as a screenshot, stripped of the ad's fuller context.
What it cost#BoycottManyavar trended nationally; showroom protestsembarrassing

The lesson

A ritual is not a slogan. Naming it in an ad, even to critique it gently, hands the audience a fight about identity instead of a reason to buy.

Aftermath

Manyavar did not withdraw the ad, unlike Tanishq's near-simultaneous retreat, and the controversy faded within the news cycle without a lasting boycott. The episode became a reference point in Indian advertising for the risk of touching religious ritual language even with an ostensibly progressive message.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →