The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026
BlueTyga's 'India's 1st Sunscreen Jacket' and Milind Soman ad upheld by ASCI
BlueTyga's YouTube ad called its jacket 'India's 1st' and had Milind Soman vouch for it. ASCI upheld both claims — no due diligence anywhere.
BlueTyga Fashions · 2026-07-31
What happened
A YouTube short for the Blue Tyga Sunscreen Jacket made three claims: "98% UVA UVB protection", "It blocks more than 98% of UVA and UVB rays", and "India's 1st Sunscreen Jacket", with actor and athlete Milind Soman featured as endorser.
ASCI went to technical experts on the UV claims. BlueTyga supplied laboratory test reports covering the fabric fresh, after repeated washing, and wet, plus multiple product variants. On that evidence, the 98% UVA/UVB claims were substantiated and the Council did not uphold them.
But the "India's 1st Sunscreen Jacket" claim rested on Amazon listing dates for a handful of brands, one Shopify listing, an invoice and sales data. ASCI found the submission did not cover all UPF 50+ sunscreen-jacket brands in India, did not establish availability across other platforms or retail channels, and carried no source or date in the ad. The superlative was held misleading by exaggeration, breaching Chapter I clauses 1.1, 1.2 and 1.4.
The Milind Soman endorsement was upheld too: the endorsement agreement had no clause confirming the celebrity did due diligence that the claims could be substantiated, breaching clauses (c) and (d) of the ASCI Guidelines for Celebrities in Advertising. The ad was ordered to be modified.
Why it happened
- 'India's 1st' is the highest-risk superlative in advertising: to prove it you must survey the whole category, and BlueTyga brought a stack of Amazon dates instead
- The UV claims passed because the evidence was real — the failure was confined to the one claim the brand had no way to prove
- The celebrity half was a separate, avoidable breach: Milind Soman's agreement had no due-diligence clause at all
The lesson
A 'first in the country' claim needs the whole market, not your own listings. Prove the category first, or drop the superlative — and never put a name on a claim nobody has checked.
Aftermath
ASCI recommended the misleading representations be modified or withdrawn. The case illustrates the checklist that now lands on Indian advertisers: a superlative must be substantiated across all channels and platforms, and a celebrity endorsement requires documented due diligence from the endorser. The claims that were properly tested — the 98% UV protection — survived the review intact.
Sources
- ASCI Complaint Outcome: BlueTyga Fashions — Blue Tyga Sunscreen Jacket (31 Jul 2026)
- ASCI Complaint Outcomes index (31 Jul 2026)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Victoria's Secret went quiet when its new China ambassador fell into a copyright row
H&M's product-page model ruled 'extremely thin' — body ideal ad struck down
Sea Beauty's 'remove 10 years old tan' before-and-after ad upheld by ASCI
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.