Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2025–2026

Manolo Blahnik survived 55 years — Saks' bankruptcy cost it its first loss

FY2025: a pre-tax loss of €1.6M after years of profit — Saks Global's bankruptcy wrote off debts, froze shipments, and pushed the house to sell direct.

Manolo Blahnik · 2026-08-04

What happened

When Manolo Blahnik published its 2025 accounts in August 2026, the shoemaker founded in 1970 posted a pre-tax loss of €1.6 million — after decades of profit. Revenue slipped to €83.5 million, down 3% as reported and 1% at constant currency. EBITDA fell 36% to €5.4 million, part of it the cost of opening stores. The oddity in the accounts: gross margin had actually improved by a point. The product was selling; the money was stuck somewhere else.

The somewhere else was Saks Global, the parent of Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, which spent most of 2025 in bankruptcy. Manolo Blahnik carried the exposure of a major wholesale partner going down: an impairment on the receivables Saks could not pay, and merchandise that could not be shipped while the partner's payments stopped. A weak dollar compounded the hit. Chief executive Kristina Blahnik called it 'one of the most challenging backdrops we have faced in recent years'.

The response was a channel decision. Direct-to-consumer sales grew 14% in the year while wholesale fell, and the house kept building its own estate: 24 stores by year-end, 14 of them directly operated flagships, with Miami, Milan and Costa Mesa opened in 2025 and Beijing in January 2026, alongside an e-commerce launch in China. The family business also tightened its grip, buying the remaining shares of its Hong Kong entity.

The shape of the case: the brand was not broken by its customers but by a counterparty. The loss is the invoice for lending your balance sheet to a department store — and the fix is owning the door instead.

Why it happened

  • Wholesale concentration in US department stores meant Saks Global's six-month bankruptcy was inherited directly — unpaid receivables written off, shipments frozen
  • The €1.6 million pre-tax loss arrived in a year when gross margin improved: the damage was counterparty and currency, not product
  • EBITDA fell 36% partly because the house kept opening stores through the year its biggest partner was insolvent — investment continued while wholesale revenue stalled
  • The pivot answers the exposure: DTC grew 14%, the estate grew to 24 stores — the house is buying back the risk it used to hand to retailers
What it costfirst pre-tax loss; €1.6M in the redcostly

The lesson

A luxury brand's wholesale book is a loan to its partners. When Saks went down, Manolo Blahnik's first loss in years was the invoice — the fix is owning the door rather than the order form.

Aftermath

Saks has since emerged from bankruptcy as Exemplar Luxury Group under chief executive Geoffroy van Raemdonck, and Manolo Blahnik expects its US wholesale revenue to recover from the first half of 2026. Direct sales grew double digits in early 2026 while the Beijing boutique and the Chinese e-commerce site open the next market. The question is whether the house keeps the discipline of selling to itself once the department stores start paying again.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →