The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2021
L'Oréal promised streamers its lowest price — then undercut them in its own room
L'Oréal sold ampoule masks at ¥429 as 'the year's best deal' via Li Jiaqi and Viya — then ¥257.7 in its own room. Both streamers suspended it; it apologised.
L'Oréal Paris (巴黎欧莱雅) · L'Oréal (欧莱雅集团) · 2021-11-17
What happened
On 20 October 2021, ahead of Double 11, L'Oréal Paris sold its 50-piece ampoule face mask for ¥429 in the livestream rooms of Li Jiaqi and Viya, promoted by the brand itself as the biggest deal of the year. Days into the festival, shoppers found the same mask in L'Oréal's own livestream room at ¥257.7 once stackable coupons were applied — pre-sale buyers had paid about 66% more.
Complaints piled up: the Heimao consumer platform counted 10,637 collective complaints by 17 November. That evening the companies behind Li Jiaqi and Viya issued near-identical statements: negotiations with L'Oréal had produced no solution, the brand had 24 hours to offer one or the streamers would compensate buyers themselves — and all cooperation with L'Oréal Paris was suspended until the dispute was resolved.
L'Oréal apologised before dawn on 18 November, blaming overlapping platform and store coupons for the price stack, and promised a solution protecting buyers' interests. The plan that followed — threshold coupons rather than refunds — drew a second wave of anger. The Zhejiang consumer council observed that a business that loses trust loses everything; the episode became the canonical case of a brand breaking its own price promise across channels.
Why it happened
- One brand, two price truths: the 'deal of the year' promised to top streamers coexisted with a cheaper coupon stack in the brand's own room
- The promise was the campaign — buyers paid ¥429 because of it, so the gap read as bad faith rather than a pricing accident
- Compensation with strings attached: threshold coupons instead of refunds turned a pricing dispute into a trust crisis
- Channel power had shifted: two livestream rooms could jointly suspend a global brand and set it a 24-hour deadline
The lesson
A price promise is a contract with every buyer: L'Oréal's 'deal of the year', undone by its own cheaper room, cost it both top livestream channels and a public apology.
Aftermath
L'Oréal settled compensation with pre-sale buyers and apologised again. The case is still cited in China as the moment livestream channels proved they could discipline a global brand on price.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Victoria's Secret went quiet when its new China ambassador fell into a copyright row
Supor's own storefront posted AI ads of a man walking in on a woman showering
Livestreamer Xu Jingwan (许静婉) hid income in private accounts and lost ¥6.3m to fines
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.