Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Financial decision · 2026

Livestreamer Xu Jingwan (许静婉) hid income in private accounts and lost ¥6.3m to fines

Six-million-follower livestreamer Xu Jingwan hid ¥3.1m of income in private accounts; the tax authority fined her ¥6.3m and the case became a national example.

许静婉 · 2026-07-10

What happened

Xu Jingwan, a livestream seller with more than six million followers, ran her business on the platforms between 2021 and 2023 while collecting part of her income through personal accounts. The Hangzhou Tax Service's third inspection bureau found she had underpaid ¥3.13 million of personal income tax and VAT by hiding revenue and converting its character.

On 10 July 2026 the State Administration of Taxation published her case as one of the day's batch of influencer tax investigations. Xu was ordered to repay the ¥3.13 million she owed plus fines of ¥6.32 million.

The case became a public lesson in how much of a livestreamer's income the tax office can see when platforms and account flows are traced — and how quickly a career built on public trust turns into a cautionary headline.

Why it happened

  • Collecting income through private accounts to keep it off the tax file is a structural choice that only works until the account flows are traced.
  • A six-million-follower seller is public property; the moment the tax authority named her, the scandal outran the money at issue.
  • Routing sales income away from the platform's visible records converted a routine tax question into a demonstration case for the whole industry.
What it cost¥3.13m underpaid tax; ¥6.32m fine; national example setcostly

The lesson

For a public-figure seller, the tax bill is small next to the cost of being named. Hiding income in private accounts trades a modest liability for a demonstration case against the whole industry.

Aftermath

On 10 July 2026 the State Administration of Taxation published Xu Jingwan's case alongside other influencer tax investigations. She was ordered to repay the ¥3.13 million in underpaid tax plus ¥6.32 million in fines, and the case was widely covered as an example of the 2026 crackdown on livestream tax evasion.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →