Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2005–2015

LifeLock's CEO put his real Social Security number on billboards — then got robbed

Todd Davis advertised identity-theft protection with his real SSN. He was robbed 13+ times, and the FTC later fined LifeLock $100M for the false ad claims.

LifeLock · 2005

What happened

LifeLock built its identity-theft-protection business on a stunt: CEO Todd Davis put his real Social Security number on billboards, TV ads and the company's own trucks, backed by a '100% guarantee' that the service would protect subscribers from identity theft. The ads ran for years and helped make LifeLock a household name.

Davis was confirmed to have been a victim of identity theft at least 13 times using the number he had publicized — including someone taking out a $500 payday loan in his name. The stunt that was supposed to prove the product worked instead demonstrated its limits.

In 2010, the FTC and 35 states settled deceptive-advertising claims against LifeLock over its guarantee claims. LifeLock kept running similar ads and, in 2015, the FTC found it had violated the 2010 order — this time for $100 million, of which $68 million went to customer refunds.

Why it happened

  • A publicity stunt built the brand around a guarantee the product could not actually back up.
  • Publicizing a real SSN as proof of confidence handed the company's own weakness a very visible test case.
  • LifeLock kept the same ad claims running for years after regulators first found them deceptive, turning a warning into a second, larger penalty.
What it cost$100M FTC contempt settlement (2015)costly

The lesson

A guarantee-driven stunt ad only works until the product is tested for real — and testing a security promise in public invites the exact failure it claims to prevent.

Aftermath

LifeLock continued operating and was acquired by Symantec in 2017 for $2.3 billion, later sold on as part of Norton's consumer security business. The Davis billboard remains a textbook example cited by marketers and regulators alike on the risk of advertising a guarantee you cannot fully deliver.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →