Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2016

DeVry advertised a 90% job-placement rate — the FTC fined it $100M for the claim

TV and radio ads claimed 90% of DeVry graduates landed jobs in their field within six months. The FTC ruled the number was engineered and settled for $100M.

DeVry University · DeVry Education Group · 2016-12-15

What happened

For years DeVry University advertised on TV, radio and online that 90 percent of its graduates actively seeking employment landed jobs in their field within six months of graduation. Ads also claimed that DeVry bachelor's graduates earned, on average, 15 percent higher incomes one year after graduation than graduates with bachelor's degrees from all other colleges and universities.

On December 15, 2016 the FTC announced a $100 million settlement, charging that both claims were deceptive and that 'tens of thousands of students' had been harmed. The agency's complaint said the 90 percent figure counted jobs graduates held before they graduated, and jobs outside their field — so the headline number was engineered rather than measured.

The settlement was structured as consumer relief: $49.4 million in cash for qualifying students, plus $50.6 million in debt relief — $30.35 million wiping out the full balance on private unpaid student loans DeVry issued to undergraduates between September 2008 and September 2015, and $20.25 million against debts for tuition, books and lab fees. DeVry also had to release transcripts and diplomas it had withheld over unpaid balances, and the order banned the job-placement and income claims outright.

DeVry denied wrongdoing — 'DeVry Group chose to settle this action after filing an answer denying all allegations of wrongdoing,' it said, insisting that the academic quality of a DeVry education had never been questioned. The settlement nonetheless became the benchmark FTC action against for-profit college advertising: a public correction as large as the ads' reach.

Why it happened

  • The ad put a hard number — 90 percent — on an outcome the school's own counting inflated by including jobs held before graduation.
  • For-profit enrollment marketing ran on the promise that the degree pays for itself; the '15% more income' claim was the economic justification for the tuition, not a measured fact.
  • The claims were everywhere — TV, radio, online — so the correction had to be public and expensive to match the reach.
  • Settling after denying kept the money flowing to students while the company avoided a trial record — a calculation the fine made expensive but survivable.
What it cost$100M — $49.4M cash, $50.6M debt reliefcostly

The lesson

Advertise the number only if the measurement is honest. A placement rate padded with pre-graduation jobs is a promise the regulator will audit.

Aftermath

DeVry's parent renamed itself Adtalem in 2017, closing the era of the '90 percent' ads. The settlement became the FTC's benchmark for for-profit education marketing: cash to students, debts forgiven, transcripts released, and the claims that sold the enrollment banned from future advertising.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →